Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was looking at 4be6783711b2ff510c3449c5de22d35663d8bfc1 and
> 3553001bcc425dfb5d84a2dc8d657fe92c007962 with a view to forward porting them
> to Qt 5, but I think they are still buggy.
>
> As xml is not line-based, the parsing should be able to handle legal content
Hi,
I was looking at 4be6783711b2ff510c3449c5de22d35663d8bfc1 and
3553001bcc425dfb5d84a2dc8d657fe92c007962 with a view to forward porting them
to Qt 5, but I think they are still buggy.
As xml is not line-based, the parsing should be able to handle legal content
like this:
images/star.png
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=13494
==
Reported By:Stephen Kelly
Assigned To:
I personally use the "Lazareus: Form Recovery" web browser extension for
this purpose. I have never lost any typed message since it is enabled.
Available for Chrome and Firefox.
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 4:24 PM, David Cole wrote:
> That would be awesome. I HATE it when that happens to me in Manti
That would be awesome. I HATE it when that happens to me in Mantis (at
least once every few months, and it's always very irritating...)
I'll ask our sysadmin guys, don't know if there's a Mantis update we
could take or something but I'll ask.
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 2:44 AM, Eric Noulard wr
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=13493
==
Reported By:Stephen Kelly
Assigned To:
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=13492
==
Reported By:Stephen Kelly
Assigned To:
Stephen Kelly wrote:
>
> The STREQUAL expression also makes the CONFIG expression redundant and
> equivalent to $,...>. I can see reason to keep
> CONFIG anyway because it is more convenient and is expected to be commonly
> used I think.
Actually, a good reason to keep the CONFIG expression is to
Brad King wrote:
> On 08/22/2012 06:12 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
>>> of linking there are multiple targets involved so we do not know
>>> which one the user may mean.
>>
>> I think it's something we can just define, is it not?
>
> Some expressions might want the target being linked while others m
