2013/7/12 Alan W. Irwin ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca:
On 2013-07-11 16:30-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
These commands
file(DOWNLOAD
http://download.gnome.org/sources/glib/2.32/glib-2.32.1.tar.xz;
On 2013-07-12 11:21+0200 Eric Noulard wrote:
so my best bet is that the CMake command your are using has no SSL support
which makes the https handling fail with unsupported protocol.
Hi Eric:
Your hypothesis was absolutely correct (as you can see from my later
posts in this thread). In
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=14288
==
Reported By:Emmanuel Blot
Assigned To:
Hi CMake developers!
I'm interested in contributing towards Windows Phone 8 support in CMAKE,
i.e. http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=13791
I'm working on a patch that will allow C/C++ static libraries (.lib) to be
built with CMAKE. The patch creates a Visual Studio 2012 (v11)
Brad King wrote:
On 07/11/2013 11:08 AM, Brad King wrote:
Can anyone else think of complications?
Side note: If we cannot resolve this soon we should revert
CMAKE_SYSROOT before 2.8.12 to leave room for the two to
be combined later.
I've reverted it now. I've also removed the
clin...@elemtech.com wrote:
What is the motivation for deprecating these?
Can we just let them fade away on their own as the world moves from Qt4 to
Qt5?
This is entirely orthogonal to Qt 5.
qt4_use_modules is new, but provides no benefit over tll(). We shouldn't
encourage adoption of it
Alexander Neundorf wrote:
Hi,
I was surprised today, something worked which I expected to fail:
Can you say which version of cmake this did fail with?
Note that it is more likely to *compile* since 2.8.11 because includes and
defines are part of the target interface, but linking should
This result is surprising:
http://open.cdash.org/testSummary.php?project=1name=RunCMake.ObsoleteQtMacrosdate=2013-07-12
There is a QT4_WORKS test in Tests/CMakeLists.txt. Is that hiding this issue
in other Qt4 based unit tests? Rather than hiding the issue, and idea what's
going on?
Hi all,
I am using CMake again since a couple of weeks for a project involving the
build of recognition system. This system is made of hundred sub recognition
system that must be all trained with about ~10k files as input.
I ended up writing something like that:
== BEGIN
# A project with
On Friday 12 July 2013, Stephen Kelly wrote:
Stephen Kelly wrote:
Yes, apart from tll-new-signatures, I'd like to try to get the
export-policy and target-LOCATION-policy topics from my clone into
2.8.12.
Actually, the export-policy branch deprecates the ability to write code
like
Nicolas Desprès wrote:
I have pushed my work so far on my github clone of CMake.
https://github.com/nicolasdespres/CMake/tree/topic/large-deps-perf
Something must have gone wrong with the push :)
stephen@hal:~/dev/src/cmake{master}$ git show origin/master | grep commit
commit
On 2013-07-12 23:33+0200 Eric Noulard wrote:
Seriously, though, what do you do in the Windows case where
there is no trusted distribution to build the openssl library for you? I
presume you download some Windows binary from a location you trust, but
what location is that?
Then ask your
On Jul 12, 2013, at 4:27 PM, David Cole wrote:
It’s a bad bad really bad idea to make the build of OpenSSL “in-house” as
you’ve been calling it... CMake SHOULD use the system openssl for
distributions that have one already.
I must have missed where ignoring a system version was implied.
13 matches
Mail list logo
