On Fri, 30 May 2014 13:13:07 -0400
Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> That was my assumption also. I would've thought that would be better,
> as coreutils basically exists only on Linux. (And even then, someone
> could in theory have a different 'cp', though that is unlikely.)
>
> @Alessandro, would you e
On 2014-05-29 08:56, Brad King wrote:
> I did not realize in my previous response that you intend
> to execute a "cp" process, but rather thought you would
> be implementing the underlying calls to the filesystem
> directly.
That was my assumption also. I would've thought that would be better, as
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=14947
==
Reported By:norbert.nemec
Assigned To:
