The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=15559
==
Reported By:trsystran
Assigned To:
2015-05-04 9:53 GMT+02:00 Domen Vrankar domen.vran...@gmail.com:
Your test managed to find issues with previous code - automatic
dependency detection doesn't work on older versions of dpkg-shlibdeps
script.
I wrote that a bit unclearly... With previous code I meant code that
was there
On 05/07/2015 01:09 AM, Kevin Godby wrote:
Apparently on line 250 of WriteCompilerDetectionHeader.cmake, CMake
was parsing FILE as a variable instead of a string. Wrapping FILE
in quotation marks fixed the problem.
Thanks. That fix depends on CMP0054 being set to NEW. This
should fix it
Hi,
testing new cmake, I get ctest error for the call
# ctest -R CPackComponentsPrefix
This is the relevant part in LastTest.log
...
CPack: Install projects
CPack: - Run preinstall target for: CPackComponentsPrefix
CPack: - Install project:
On 07-May-15 00:00, Tamás Kenéz wrote:
Hi,
The search path rule #5 reads:
Search project build trees recently configured in a cmake-gui(1). This can be
skipped if
NO_CMAKE_BUILDS_PATH is passed. It is intended for the case when a user is
building
multiple dependent projects one after
Would you please add
set( CPACK_DEBIAN_PACKAGE_DEBUG ON)
to the file
MyLibCPackConfig-splitted-components-depend2.cmake.in
so that we also have the debug logs?
I currently don't have access to my computer so I'll send you that in
about a week.
Sorry I forgot about this...
Attached is
On 05/06/2015 02:32 PM, Ben Boeckel wrote:
I really question the old behavior at all (it's not like it made things
magically work), but OK :/ . I'd be OK with replacing it with `-k`
without a policy though (it does the same thing but makes the exit
code...useful).
IIRC when use of -i was
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 13:06:26 -0400, Ben Boeckel wrote:
Merged as update-ctest_build-docs.
Thanks for the followup commit for clarifying the docs. I hit the
problem where CTEST_BUILD_COMMAND makes CTEST_BUILD_FLAGS get ignored.
The new wording makes it much clearer :) .
--Ben
--
Powered by
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 09:12:43 -0400, Brad King wrote:
IIRC when use of -i was introduced we actually used -k first and found
it to be inadequate for the needs at the time. Since requirements seem
to have changed I think switching to -k is okay.
I've merged this into next as
