On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 20:18:02 -0700, Justin Berger wrote:
> I agree on the maximizing code reuse, but that doesn't require them to use
> the same operational mode -- the two modes do fundamentally different
> things; even while sharing most internal components. Is the idea that you
> could only
19:54, 14 February 2017 г., Ben Boeckel :On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 20:18:02 -0700, Justin Berger wrote: I agree on the maximizing code reuse, but that doesn't require them to use the same operational mode -- the two modes do fundamentally different things; even while sharing
On 02/14/2017 10:54 AM, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
> I think it may be easier to do this inside CMake by generating the "new"
> form of the add_test() command in the produced CTestTestfile.cmake. From
> some experiments I've got the impression that that's always executed
> with paths relative to
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 08:23:58 -0500, Brad King wrote:
> On 02/13/2017 10:00 AM, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
>> I've written it as a reStructuredText document here [2].
>> [2]:
>> https://gitlab.kitware.com/muggenhor/cmake/blob/ctest-alt-dir/Help/ctest_alt_dir.rst
>
> Thanks for the nice
On 02/13/2017 10:00 AM, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
> I've written it as a reStructuredText document here [2].
> [2]:
> https://gitlab.kitware.com/muggenhor/cmake/blob/ctest-alt-dir/Help/ctest_alt_dir.rst
Thanks for the nice write-up!
>From the doc:
> generate a relative path from the
On 02/13/2017 10:18 PM, Justin Berger wrote:
> I agree on the maximizing code reuse, but that doesn't require them to use
> the same operational mode -- the two modes do fundamentally different things
Right. We shouldn't necessarily expect the server to start and then decide
whether it is a code