Re: [cmake-developers] [CMake] Visual Studio - Ninja Generator

2015-09-22 Thread Stephen Kelly
James Johnston wrote: >> > it would be useful to have Visual Studio available as an "Extra" CMake >> > generator. For example, specification of "Visual Studio 2015 - Ninja" >> >> This functionality sounds reasonable but the name of the extra/generator >> pair looks funny when spelled out that

Re: [cmake-developers] [CMake] Visual Studio - Ninja Generator

2015-09-11 Thread James Johnston
> -Original Message- > From: cmake-developers [mailto:cmake-developers-boun...@cmake.org] > On Behalf Of Brad King > Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2015 15:00 > To: cmake-developers@cmake.org > Subject: Re: [cmake-developers] [CMake] Visual Studio - > Ninja Generat

Re: [cmake-developers] [CMake] Visual Studio - Ninja Generator

2015-09-09 Thread Brad King
On 09/02/2015 03:34 PM, James Johnston wrote: > useful if the Visual Studio generators in CMake were refactored somewhat Even without the C# motivation I think factoring out a "MSBuild" generator infrastructure internally will be useful. Currently we call it "VS 10" because it happened to be the

Re: [cmake-developers] [CMake] Visual Studio - Ninja Generator

2015-09-02 Thread James Johnston
Recently I have wondered if it would be useful if the Visual Studio generators in CMake were refactored somewhat (to what degree, I am not sure). Not that I have time to work on it right now, and I have not studied this section of CMake code in detail, so I may be a little off base with some