On 02/12/2014 06:25 PM, Steve Wilson wrote:
On a side note, I am running out of time for contributing these patches back
to the project. I am spending more time responding to requests to re-order
and change commit messages etc.. than I am changing the code (I am learning
and will get it
On Feb 15, 2014, at 2:06 AM, Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com wrote:
I still don't know if you got an error message without posting it when
you tried to reset before, or whether you managed to reset your local
branch to the right point:
Steve Wilson wrote:
I just pushed the topic AddCustomCommandWithConfig to stage. This topic
implements the CONFIG keyword for add_custom_command().
I haven't looked thoroughly, but how much does dependency
specification/handling need to change? The dependency of a command on a set
of
On 02/12/2014 04:15 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
I haven't looked thoroughly, but how much does dependency
specification/handling need to change? The dependency of a command on a set
of targets should now be config-specific, right?
I haven't read through the topic yet but IIRC we discussed the
On Feb 12, 2014, at 2:15 AM, Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com wrote:
I haven't looked thoroughly, but how much does dependency
specification/handling need to change? The dependency of a command on a set
of targets should now be config-specific, right? Does that mean making
changes to
On 02/12/2014 08:40 AM, Brad King wrote:
On 02/12/2014 04:15 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
I haven't looked thoroughly, but how much does dependency
specification/handling need to change? The dependency of a command on a set
of targets should now be config-specific, right?
I haven't read
I just pushed the topic AddCustomCommandWithConfig to stage. This topic
implements the CONFIG keyword for add_custom_command().
SteveW
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
