Hi Eric,
I was very interested in this but I unfortunately didn't have the time and
probably won't have much time to work on this for the next year or so.
Are you going to start working on this?
Renato
On Mon, Jul 3, 2017, 09:28 Eric Noulard wrote:
> Hi Renato,
>
>
Hi Renato,
Did you start to work on a Bazel generator for CMake?
If not do you still plan to do it?
Eric
2017-03-17 11:51 GMT+01:00 Renato Utsch :
> Ooh good to know, I'll take a look at how you're doing that.
>
> No, the build system is Bazel.
>
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017,
2017-03-17 11:51 GMT+01:00 Renato Utsch :
> Ooh good to know, I'll take a look at how you're doing that.
>
> No, the build system is Bazel.
>
I'd be interested in a Bazel generator as well.
I may help or review it depending on my spare time.
Eric
> On Fri, Mar 17,
Ooh good to know, I'll take a look at how you're doing that.
No, the build system is Bazel.
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017, 04:58 Charles Huet wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> is this buildsystem by any chance FastBuild ?
> Because if so there is an effort (I'd like to say ongoing, but it's
Hi,
is this buildsystem by any chance FastBuild ?
Because if so there is an effort (I'd like to say ongoing, but it's been on
hold since the release of 9.7) to implement one here:
https://github.com/packadal/CMake/tree/fastbuild-master
Otherwise I guess it can serve as another example, as far
Hello,
Is there documentation somewhere on how to add a new generator to CMake?
There's a build system I really want CMake to support, and I'd like to
contribute to make that happen.
How difficult / how much code is involved in writing a new generator? The
build system has nothing to do with