Michael SP/HZA-ZSEP
> Cc: CMake Developers
> Subject: Re: [cmake-developers] C# support ready for review
>
> Simple question : do you think that this would be useable in order to have a
> single build pipeline based on CMake for a Unity3D project that also requires
> s
:51 AM
>> To: Brad King
>> Cc: Stuermer, Michael SP/HZA-ZSEP; CMake Developers
>> Subject: Re: [cmake-developers] C# support ready for review
>>
>> Seems to me like C# support should work just fine with other generators:
>> ninja, nmake, and UNIX Makefiles in
todo list until C#
support may reach a mature level.
best regards,
Michael
> -Original Message-
> From: David Cole [mailto:dlrd...@aol.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2016 12:51 AM
> To: Brad King
> Cc: Stuermer, Michael SP/HZA-ZSEP; CMake Developers
> Subject: Re: [c
ubject: Re: [cmake-developers] C# support ready for review
>
> On 02/25/2016 05:51 AM, Stuermer, Michael SP/HZA-ZSEP wrote:
> > The part that probably needs most additional work is all the C#
> > detection and configuration part in the module scripts.
>
> In your branch Modules/CM
Seems to me like C# support should work just fine with other generators: ninja,
nmake, and UNIX Makefiles included. Especially with mono on Linux/Mac.
David
> On Mar 7, 2016, at 2:12 PM, Brad King wrote:
>
>> On 02/25/2016 05:51 AM, Stuermer, Michael SP/HZA-ZSEP
On 02/25/2016 05:51 AM, Stuermer, Michael SP/HZA-ZSEP wrote:
> The part that probably needs most additional work is all the
> C# detection and configuration part in the module scripts.
In your branch Modules/CMakeDetermineCSharpCompiler.cmake currently
has a lot of logic and environment checks
Original Message-
> From: cmake-developers [mailto:cmake-developers-boun...@cmake.org]
> On Behalf Of Stuermer, Michael SP/HZA-ZSEP
> Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 5:52 AM
> To: Gilles Khouzam <gilles.khou...@microsoft.com>; CMake Developers
> <cmake-developers@cma
;))
>
> You seem to have some slight discrepancies between your code and the
> release as there are changes that seem to be either unnecessary or going
> backwards. I noticed a tegra comment that seemed out of place as well as a
> comment change going from 14 to 12 where 14 was accurate.
rs [mailto:cmake-developers-boun...@cmake.org] On Behalf Of
Stuermer, Michael SP/HZA-ZSEP
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 06:03
To: CMake Developers <cmake-developers@cmake.org>
Subject: [cmake-developers] C# support ready for review
Native C# support is ready for review. I split the patc
make.org] On Behalf Of
Stuermer, Michael SP/HZA-ZSEP
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 06:03
To: CMake Developers <cmake-developers@cmake.org>
Subject: [cmake-developers] C# support ready for review
Native C# support is ready for review. I split the patch in two parts:
part 1:
Some prepara
g<mailto:cmake-developers@cmake.org>>
Subject: [cmake-developers] C# support ready for review
Native C# support is ready for review. I split the patch in two parts:
part 1:
Some preparational stuff that does not really change or enable anything.
Documentation and Test files a
ch I need
for local building and usage.
best regards,
Michael
From: cmake-developers [mailto:cmake-developers-boun...@cmake.org] On Behalf Of
Stuermer, Michael SP/HZA-ZSEP
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 3:03 PM
To: CMake Developers
Subject: [cmake-developers] C# support ready for review
Nati
rmer, Michael SP/HZA-ZSEP
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 06:03
To: CMake Developers
<cmake-developers@cmake.org<mailto:cmake-developers@cmake.org>>
Subject: [cmake-developers] C# support ready for review
Native C# support is ready for review. I split the patch in two parts:
p
ry to play with this next week and get projects running on it.
~Gilles
From: cmake-developers [mailto:cmake-developers-boun...@cmake.org] On Behalf Of
Stuermer, Michael SP/HZA-ZSEP
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 06:03
To: CMake Developers <cmake-developers@cmake.org>
Subject: [cmake-developers]
Native C# support is ready for review. I split the patch in two parts:
part 1:
Some preparational stuff that does not really change or enable anything.
Documentation and Test files as well as the required CMake module is added. The
changes to existing code are small, only few methods in
15 matches
Mail list logo