On 08/06/2013 09:19 AM, Brad King wrote:
On second thought adding yet another dimension to the compiler
identification is just more complexity. We can use a separate
compiler id for each variant and simply have the platform
information modules for each vendor include the upstream one.
I've
Am 14.08.2013 08:12, schrieb Rolf Eike Beer:
s...@rogue-research.com wrote:
http://open.cdash.org/testDetails.php?test=201937829build=2986379
(MacOS 10.8)
shows 3.4.0. But since even 3.4 does not seem to be released I
wonder
what's
going on there?
That one is the open source clang, which
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 10:15:11 +0200, Rolf Eike Beer said:
http://open.cdash.org/testDetails.php?test=203678570build=2998892
Looks like the headers are not those that belong to that version of
Clang, but older ones.
To which headers do you refer? On that version of the OS and Xcode, I believe
s...@rogue-research.com wrote:
http://open.cdash.org/testDetails.php?test=201937829build=2986379
(MacOS 10.8)
shows 3.4.0. But since even 3.4 does not seem to be released I wonder
what's
going on there?
That one is the open source clang, which I build from svn. It's not from
On 08/05/2013 03:45 PM, Brad King wrote:
One of the main purposes of the compiler id is to load platform
modules like Platform/os-id-lang and Compiler/id-lang.
Most of the information in these files will be identical across
the upstream and vendor-specific Clang distributions so having a
s...@rogue-research.com wrote:
Yeah, it's confusing... :(
http://open.cdash.org/testDetails.php?test=201937899build=2986383
(MacOS 10.7)
The CXX compiler identification is Clang 4.0.0
I do not believe that.
Apple has their own fork/branch of clang which they use in Xcode.
On 08/05/2013 02:08 AM, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
s...@rogue-research.com wrote:
very confusingly, Apple uses their own version numbering scheme. So
that's Apple clang 4.0. It comes with whatever version of Xcode that
machine's running (4.4 I think?).
any version checking like I do in the
On 08/05/2013 09:26 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
Brad King wrote:
We need to fix this somehow or CMAKE_*_COMPILER_VERSION will be
useless for Clang. Sean, is there any way to extract the underlying
Clang version, perhaps with different preprocessor macros? We at
least need to be able to detect
On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 08:08:20 +0200, Rolf Eike Beer said:
So
any version checking like I do in the CXXFeatures test (I have compiler
version X, the supported features should be ...) is entirely mood for Clang.
Great.
Well, I don't know what we're really talking about here... but it sounds like
On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 09:44:00 -0400, Brad King said:
and local testing we can use __APPLE_CC__ to detect Apple compiler
builds.
In my own build of open source clang from svn trunk, it seems that __APPLE_CC__
is defined:
$ clang -dM -E - /dev/null
#define __APPLE_CC__ 5621
So I don't think
Sean McBride wrote:
On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 08:08:20 +0200, Rolf Eike Beer said:
So
any version checking like I do in the CXXFeatures test (I have compiler
version X, the supported features should be ...) is entirely mood for
Clang. Great.
Well, I don't know what we're really talking about
On 08/05/2013 11:33 AM, Sean McBride wrote:
In my own build of open source clang from svn trunk, it seems that
__APPLE_CC__ is defined:
$ clang -dM -E - /dev/null
#define __APPLE_CC__ 5621
So I don't think that will help.
I also see __apple_build_version__ in that output. Searching
On 08/05/2013 03:28 PM, Brad King wrote:
I also see __apple_build_version__ in that output. Searching
for it finds that it is used for this purpose in Qt:
https://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qtbase/commit/26c7bb25
but seems to be undocumented in general. Will that work?
Embarcadero's
Brad King wrote:
On 08/05/2013 02:08 AM, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
s...@rogue-research.com wrote:
very confusingly, Apple uses their own version numbering scheme. So
that's Apple clang 4.0. It comes with whatever version of Xcode that
machine's running (4.4 I think?).
any version
cmake-developers@cmake.org
Sent: Sat, Aug 3, 2013 11:05 pm
Subject: [cmake-developers] Suspicious Clang versions
http://open.cdash.org/testDetails.php?test=201937899build=2986383
(MacOS 10.7)
The CXX compiler identification is Clang 4.0.0
I do not believe that. Especially as
http
Yeah, it's confusing... :(
http://open.cdash.org/testDetails.php?test=201937899build=2986383
(MacOS 10.7)
The CXX compiler identification is Clang 4.0.0
I do not believe that.
Apple has their own fork/branch of clang which they use in Xcode. AFAICT
it's not so different from the open
http://open.cdash.org/testDetails.php?test=201937899build=2986383
(MacOS 10.7)
The CXX compiler identification is Clang 4.0.0
I do not believe that. Especially as
http://open.cdash.org/testDetails.php?test=201937829build=2986379
(MacOS 10.8)
shows 3.4.0. But since even 3.4 does not seem to
17 matches
Mail list logo
