On Monday, June 04, 2012 11:58:19 PM Stephen Kelly wrote:
> David Cole wrote:
> > We are preparing to build CMake 2.8.9, release candidate one, in the
> > next
> > few days (or possibly as late as next week).
> >
> > Is there any pending/outstanding work that anybody thinks is critical
> > for
> >
I would like that, too. But I am going to be firm in saying that I will not
allow that change until the "Nightly Expected" dashboard section is
completely green with respect to all ninja submissions.
So I don't anticipate that happening in time for 2.8.9.
I'd be happy to be proven wrong, though.
I would like to have the Ninja generator enabled on all Platforms.
It is importand for cross Development, not only as native Build Tool!
With regards
Claus
On 04.06.2012, at 23:13, David Cole wrote:
> We are preparing to build CMake 2.8.9, release candidate one, in the next few
> days (or poss
Am Montag, 4. Juni 2012, 17:13:26 schrieb David Cole:
> We are preparing to build CMake 2.8.9, release candidate one, in the next
> few days (or possibly as late as next week).
>
> Is there any pending/outstanding work that anybody thinks is critical for
> inclusion in CMake 2.8.9?
>
> (I don't w
Am Dienstag, 5. Juni 2012 um 08:37:37, schrieb Brad King
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Eric Noulard wrote:
> > 2012/6/5 Kornel Benko :
> > Somebody shall dive into the build process of the libarchive Ubuntu package
> > and
> > see **why** it breaks the CMake build while using cmlibarchive do
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Eric Noulard wrote:
> 2012/6/5 Kornel Benko :
> Somebody shall dive into the build process of the libarchive Ubuntu package
> and
> see **why** it breaks the CMake build while using cmlibarchive does not.
This is the proper action. What version of libarchive is u
2012/6/5 Kornel Benko :
> Am Dienstag, 5. Juni 2012 um 10:11:40, schrieb Eric Noulard
>
>
>> Hi Kornel,
>
>> Like I said in the previous thread, we simply cannot switch to gnutar, it
>> will potentially break many other systems.
>
> OK, I understood the hesitation.
>
>> Moreover when you compiled
Am Dienstag, 5. Juni 2012 um 10:11:40, schrieb Eric Noulard
> > I already proposed a patch in the users list (using
> > "archive_write_set_format_gnutar()"
>
> Discussion is in this thread:
> http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2012-May/050483.html
>
>
> >
> > instead of "archive_write_set_fo
Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
> Stephen Kelly wrote:
>
>> David Cole wrote:
>>
>>> We are preparing to build CMake 2.8.9, release candidate one, in the
>>> next few days (or possibly as late as next week).
>>>
>>> Is there any pending/outstanding work that anybody thinks is critical
>>> for inclus
2012/6/4 David Cole :
> We are preparing to build CMake 2.8.9, release candidate one, in the next
> few days (or possibly as late as next week).
>
> Is there any pending/outstanding work that anybody thinks is critical for
> inclusion in CMake 2.8.9?
Could you take this one:
http://public.kitware
2012/6/4 David Cole :
> We are preparing to build CMake 2.8.9, release candidate one, in the next
> few days (or possibly as late as next week).
>
> Is there any pending/outstanding work that anybody thinks is critical for
> inclusion in CMake 2.8.9?
Critical, not really but that one has been wait
2012/6/5 Kornel Benko :
> Am Montag, 4. Juni 2012 um 17:13:26, schrieb David Cole
>
>
>> We are preparing to build CMake 2.8.9, release candidate one, in the next
>
>> few days (or possibly as late as next week).
>
>>
>
>> Is there any pending/outstanding work that anybody thinks is critical for
>
Stephen Kelly wrote:
> David Cole wrote:
>
>> We are preparing to build CMake 2.8.9, release candidate one, in the next
>> few days (or possibly as late as next week).
>>
>> Is there any pending/outstanding work that anybody thinks is critical for
>> inclusion in CMake 2.8.9?
>
> I'd very much
Am Montag, 4. Juni 2012 um 17:13:26, schrieb David Cole
> We are preparing to build CMake 2.8.9, release candidate one, in the next
> few days (or possibly as late as next week).
>
> Is there any pending/outstanding work that anybody thinks is critical for
> inclusion in CMake 2.8.9?
>
> (I don'
David Cole wrote:
> We are preparing to build CMake 2.8.9, release candidate one, in the next
> few days (or possibly as late as next week).
>
> Is there any pending/outstanding work that anybody thinks is critical for
> inclusion in CMake 2.8.9?
I'd very much like the POSITION_INDEPENDENT_CODE
We are preparing to build CMake 2.8.9, release candidate one, in the next
few days (or possibly as late as next week).
Is there any pending/outstanding work that anybody thinks is critical for
inclusion in CMake 2.8.9?
(I don't want to trigger a flurry of activity by sending this out... but I
sup
16 matches
Mail list logo
