Re: [cmake-developers] daemon-mode: Infrastructure

On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 02:00:14 +0200, Tobias Hunger wrote: > Implementing new Protocol Versions: > == > Deprecating old Protocol Versions: > One idea that came up on a previous project was the following: namespace protocol {

Re: [cmake-developers] daemon-mode: Infrastructure

Hi Brad, Am 17.06.2016 22:24 schrieb "Brad King" : > > On 06/13/2016 08:00 PM, Tobias Hunger wrote: > > * There will always be 1 client talking to a server. > > * Client/Server communicate using JSON messages > > Yes. IIRC it is using stdin/stdout (I haven't checked the

Re: [cmake-developers] daemon-mode: Infrastructure

On 06/13/2016 08:00 PM, Tobias Hunger wrote: > * There will always be 1 client talking to a server. > * Client/Server communicate using JSON messages Yes. IIRC it is using stdin/stdout (I haven't checked the code), so limiting to one client is implicit. In this case, is it actually a daemon?

Re: [cmake-developers] daemon-mode: Infrastructure

PS: I think it would make perfect sense to ship the first cmake version with included daemon-mode with a big, fat warning that the interfaces are not finalized yet and will change in incompatible ways during the first release cycle (or maybe two:-). In my experience you only get the full feedback

[cmake-developers] daemon-mode: Infrastructure

Hello, one important piece of feedback from the daemon-mode: Project structure discussion is that we need a policy to remove old code again. So I thought I should write up a bit about the infrastructure and versioning support of the daemon-mode branch I am working on. Basic Assumptions: