On 08/31/2015 09:35 AM, Kislinskiy, Stefan wrote:
> As there is already a patch for such a genex in bug 15509 and the
> discussion in 5939 (both linked below in Brad's reply) started 7
> years ago... It would be a great pity to let this issue seep away
> again. What can I do to help fixing this
On 08/28/2015 04:06 AM, CHEVRIER, Marc wrote:
Offering generator-expressions is a very good idea because it offers
a global solution to this problem.
Now regarding the name of the generator, may be TO_NATIVE_PATH is
not judicious, (even if problems explained in
Sorry for the false assertion.
I assumed, wrongly, that add_custom_command had same behaviour as
execute_process for which the doc clearly explains that System API are used (no
shell used).
So, adding some precisions on how add_custom_command (and add_custom_target I
presume) launch specified
