Re: [cmake-developers] Implicit library trouble with mixed languages

2017-05-04 Thread Christian Pfeiffer
On 5/3/2017 5:25 PM, Brad King wrote: > On 05/02/2017 05:47 PM, Christian Pfeiffer wrote: >> Before filtering, gcc's output gives me the libgcc and libgcc_s twice. > I think we already de-duplicate the results after extraction. This only happens for the implicit library directories and frameworks

Re: [cmake-developers] Implicit library trouble with mixed languages

2017-05-03 Thread Brad King
On 05/02/2017 05:47 PM, Christian Pfeiffer wrote: > Before filtering, gcc's output gives me the libgcc and libgcc_s twice. I think we already de-duplicate the results after extraction. > However, I was mainly asking because the general matching logic there > can break down in other ways, too.

Re: [cmake-developers] Implicit library trouble with mixed languages

2017-05-02 Thread Christian Pfeiffer
On 5/2/2017 6:52 PM, Brad King wrote: > On 05/02/2017 11:48 AM, Christian Pfeiffer wrote: >> turn depends on libgcc_s. Any library starting with 'gcc' is being >> ignored in CMakeParseImplicitLinkInfo.cmake L.136, so libgcc_s is being >> stripped from the commandline. PGI Fortran however does not

Re: [cmake-developers] Implicit library trouble with mixed languages

2017-05-02 Thread Brad King
On 05/02/2017 11:48 AM, Christian Pfeiffer wrote: > turn depends on libgcc_s. Any library starting with 'gcc' is being > ignored in CMakeParseImplicitLinkInfo.cmake L.136, so libgcc_s is being > stripped from the commandline. PGI Fortran however does not need > libgcc_s on its own and therefore