chris developerchris@... writes:
I should add the commandline for this build
emerge debug: cmake -G MinGW Makefiles -DBUILD_doc=OFF
-DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=r:/ -DCMAKE_INCLUDE_PATH=r:/include
-DCMAKE_LIBRARY_PATH=r:/lib -DCMAKE_PREFIX_PATH=r:/
-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=RelWithDebInfo q:\kate
emerge
On 04/24/2013 02:45 AM, chris wrote:
when building packages I get errors like the following...
CMake Error at /lib/cmake/KActivities/KActivitiesLibraryTargets.cmake:68
(message):
[snip]
Call Stack (most recent call first):
/lib/cmake/KActivities/KActivitiesConfig.cmake:18 (include)
On 04/24/2013 09:29 AM, DeveloperChris wrote:
I had added some message lines to try and work out how it functions
part of the log snippet I actually cut out was the following...
|
||-- Found automoc4: R:/bin/automoc4.exe||
||-- the import prefix derived from
On Wednesday 24 April 2013, Brad King wrote:
On 04/24/2013 09:29 AM, DeveloperChris wrote:
I had added some message lines to try and work out how it functions
part of the log snippet I actually cut out was the following...
||-- Found automoc4: R:/bin/automoc4.exe||
||-- the import
On 7/30/2012 3:38 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
The idea was that this is a sign of a broken install.
Can you uninstall the vtk-devel package (does this exist ?), because it
is broken, i.e. does not contain everything is claims to ?
I understand that this is maybe not expected behaviour for an
On Tuesday 31 July 2012, Bill Hoffman wrote:
On 7/30/2012 3:38 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
The idea was that this is a sign of a broken install.
Can you uninstall the vtk-devel package (does this exist ?), because it
is broken, i.e. does not contain everything is claims to ?
I
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Alexander Neundorf neund...@kde.org wrote:
On Tuesday 31 July 2012, Bill Hoffman wrote:
On 7/30/2012 3:38 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
The idea was that this is a sign of a broken install.
Can you uninstall the vtk-devel package (does this exist ?),
On 07/31/2012 02:30 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Tuesday 31 July 2012, Bill Hoffman wrote:
I wonder if we could just disable fatal error at the start of
find_package optional. Then turn it back on at the end.
As I pointed out elsewhere in this thread fatal errors are just
one way a failure
Seems like message(FATAL_ERROR/SEND_ERROR needs to know whether it's
in the middle of a find_package( OPTIONAL ) call or not.
What would happen if the only line of code in a project config file is:
message(FATAL_ERROR not implemented yet)
And then somebody did a find_package(OPTIONAL on that
On 07/30/2012 10:41 AM, David Cole wrote:
Seems like message(FATAL_ERROR/SEND_ERROR needs to know whether it's
in the middle of a find_package( OPTIONAL ) call or not.
What would happen if the only line of code in a project config file is:
message(FATAL_ERROR not implemented yet)
And
On Monday 30 July 2012, Bill Hoffman wrote:
Alex added this check:
http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=a2be068c
It guards against broken installations of packages. This is a good
thing. However, it is causing a failed test:
11 matches
Mail list logo
