Re: [cmake-developers] need info regarding netware OS support

2011-01-30 Thread Alexander Neundorf 
On Friday 28 January 2011, ajay bansal wrote:
 Hi All,

 I want to do build on netware platform. Please let me know whether cmake is
 supported netware platform ?

There is an old feasture request for it:
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=5028

Currently there is no support for netware in cmake.
I can support you with adding it.

Alex
___
cmake-developers mailing list
cmake-developers@cmake.org
http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers

[cmake-developers] Cannot push to stage?

2011-01-30 Thread Eric Noulard 
Hi there,

I cannot push to stage? or print staged branch:

$ ssh g...@cmake.org stage cmake print

is lasting forever.

any know trouble or is it on my side?
-- 
Erk
Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » -
http://www.april.org
___
cmake-developers mailing list
cmake-developers@cmake.org
http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers

Re: [cmake-developers] Cannot push to stage?

2011-01-30 Thread Marcus D. Hanwell 
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 7:37 AM, Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi there,

 I cannot push to stage? or print staged branch:

 $ ssh g...@cmake.org stage cmake print

 is lasting forever.

 any know trouble or is it on my side?

It is certainly a little slow to respond, but it gets there in the
end. Try with ssh -vvv to see where it is failing perhaps?

Marcus
___
cmake-developers mailing list
cmake-developers@cmake.org
http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers

Re: [cmake-developers] Cannot push to stage?

2011-01-30 Thread Eric Noulard 
2011/1/30 Marcus D. Hanwell marcus.hanw...@kitware.com:
 On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 7:37 AM, Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi there,

 I cannot push to stage? or print staged branch:

 $ ssh g...@cmake.org stage cmake print

 is lasting forever.

 any know trouble or is it on my side?

 It is certainly a little slow to respond, but it gets there in the
 end. Try with ssh -vvv to see where it is failing perhaps?

You were right.
It's ok now, I did manage to push properly.

-- 
Erk
Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » -
http://www.april.org
___
cmake-developers mailing list
cmake-developers@cmake.org
http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers

Re: [cmake-developers] Saving user settings with xcode generator

2011-01-30 Thread David Cole 
When you are logged in to Mantis, there should be a Monitor button right
under where you see a link to the patch that you attached...

Is there no Monitor button there?

(You may already be monitoring it if you attached a patch. I'm pretty sure
that anybody who ever edits a bug is automatically added as a monitoring
user for that issue.)

I'll add a note to it -- let's see if you get a notification about it or
not.


Thanks,
David


On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Johan Björk p...@spotify.com wrote:

 Attached patch and comments to bug
 http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=11690

 Is there some extra access rights needed to monitor an issue in the
 Mantis bugtracker? I can't seem to find any button to do it :(

 -Johan

 On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com
 wrote:
  On 12/26/2010 5:45 PM, Johan Björk wrote:
 
  Hello all,
 
  (See below for context)
 
  To solve the issue, I wish to reuse the object ID for certain
  properties[1], allowing the foo.pbxuser file to stay valid across CMake
  invocations. I modified the cmXCodeObject::GetId() function to generate
  the ID of the object, using either the name property or the comment
  property, depending on which one is available. For all other object
  types (not listed in [1]), I generate an unique object ID in the same
  way as before.
 
  The patch is not really finished, just a quick proof of concept (but
  very trivial :) ). Anyone at @Kitware think this sounds interesting
  enough to get into a release? Let me know and I'll polish up the patch
  and file a bug if deemed necessary.
 
 
  I would think a better approach would be to keep the guid's the same all
 the
  time.  I think this is done with the VS projects.  If you store them in
 the
  cache they will be preserved between runs of CMake.
 
 
  Merry xmas (And again, thanks for a great product!)
  /Johan
  [1]
  PBXProject, PBXNativeTarget, PBXApplicationReference,
 
 PBXExecutableFileReference,PBXLibraryReference,PBXToolTarget,PBXLibraryTarget,
  PBXAggregateTarget,
 
  On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Johan Björk p...@spotify.com
  mailto:p...@spotify.com wrote:
 
 Hi everyone,
 
 I haven't been able to find much information on this topic, so any
 suggestions would be greatly appreciated. When CMake regenerates the
 XCode project files, it correctly saves the user settings
 (foo.pbxuser) (contains things like executable arguments,
 environment variables and the such), however, since the GUIDs in the
 main project file changes, the pbxuser file be cleaned by XCode as
 soon as you reopen the project.
 
 First off, anyone know of any way to be able to keep the user
 settings? If not, anyone knows if this has been brought up before
 and if someone has attempted to fix it?
 
 This is with XCode 3.2.5 and CMake 2.8.3
 
 Thanks for any insight
 /Johan
 
 
 
 
  ___
  cmake-developers mailing list
  cmake-developers@cmake.org
  http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
 
 
  --
  Bill Hoffman
  Kitware, Inc.
  28 Corporate Drive
  Clifton Park, NY 12065
  bill.hoff...@kitware.com
  http://www.kitware.com
  518 881-4905 (Direct)
  518 371-3971 x105
  Fax (518) 371-4573
  ___
  cmake-developers mailing list
  cmake-developers@cmake.org
  http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
 
 ___
 cmake-developers mailing list
 cmake-developers@cmake.org
 http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers

___
cmake-developers mailing list
cmake-developers@cmake.org
http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers