[cmake-developers] Double build entries generated for Qt resource file

2014-02-05 Thread Micha Hergarden
Hello all, The latest cmake versions from the git tree seem to trigger an odd problem in my build. This is my configuration: Ubuntu 12.10 gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.7.2-2ubuntu1) 4.7.2 GNU Make 3.81 / Ninja 1.4.0.git Qt sdk 4.7.4 I have a project which uses Qt. When I generate the buildsystem, then

Re: [cmake-developers] Double build entries generated for Qt resource file

2014-02-05 Thread Stephen Kelly
Micha Hergarden wrote: I have checked out and build the most recent versions to figure out when this phenomena is introduced, and have narrowed it down to the following commit : 4b989d5f158e5135bf543438af00b03db0102ade Hi, Thanks for investigating and reporting! My questions: - I anyone

Re: [cmake-developers] push of LinkOptionsCommand topic branch

2014-02-05 Thread Stephen Kelly
Steve Wilson wrote: Ok, I’ve pushed the new changes. Are you sure? Looking at the top commit, I don't see any change to the ExportImport test. Thanks, Steve. -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Re: [cmake-developers] Double build entries generated for Qt resource file

2014-02-05 Thread Micha Hergarden
On 02/05/2014 10:15 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote: Micha Hergarden wrote: I have checked out and build the most recent versions to figure out when this phenomena is introduced, and have narrowed it down to the following commit : 4b989d5f158e5135bf543438af00b03db0102ade Hi, Thanks for

[cmake-developers] [CMake 0014736]: Xcode warning due to set ARCHS (CMAKE_OSX_ARCHITECTURES) variable in project

2014-02-05 Thread Mantis Bug Tracker
The following issue has been SUBMITTED. == http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=14736 == Reported By:lando Assigned To:

Re: [cmake-developers] push of LinkOptionsCommand topic branch

2014-02-05 Thread Steve Wilson
Let’s try all this again.I have a couple questions. On Feb 4, 2014, at 3:41 AM, Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com wrote: 2) The change to cmNinjaNormalTargetGenerator seems incorrect. Should linkFlags should be used with AddLinkOptions? Do you mean linkFlags vs vars[“LINK_FLAGS”]? I

Re: [cmake-developers] push of LinkOptionsCommand topic branch

2014-02-05 Thread Stephen Kelly
Steve Wilson wrote: Let’s try all this again.I have a couple questions. On Feb 4, 2014, at 3:41 AM, Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com wrote: 2) The change to cmNinjaNormalTargetGenerator seems incorrect. Should linkFlags should be used with AddLinkOptions? Do you mean linkFlags vs

[cmake-developers] CMAKE_CONFIGURATION_TYPES

2014-02-05 Thread Steve Wilson
In the documentation for CMAKE_CONFIGURATION_TYPES it states: “… but can be extended to provide other build types. … “ How would one provide other build types? signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware

Re: [cmake-developers] CMAKE_CONFIGURATION_TYPES

2014-02-05 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 12:00:41 -0700, Steve Wilson wrote: In the documentation for CMAKE_CONFIGURATION_TYPES it states: “… but can be extended to provide other build types. … “ How would one provide other build types? It's just a list with a default of

Re: [cmake-developers] push of LinkOptionsCommand topic branch

2014-02-05 Thread Steve Wilson
On Feb 5, 2014, at 3:06 PM, Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com wrote: Steve Wilson wrote: Now, everything you have said about not encouraging this kind of usage for target_link_options() and libraries, etc… is valid. However, does that standard apply to tests. Are tests just tests?

Re: [cmake-developers] push of LinkOptionsCommand topic branch

2014-02-05 Thread Stephen Kelly
Steve Wilson wrote: I’m not trying to push for this type of test of using libraries with target_link_options or add_link_options. (I’m already working on changes on the order that you suggested). My question has evolved more into the question of ‘what are first principles for tests?' I