2014-10-27 21:33 GMT+01:00 Ben Boeckel ben.boec...@kitware.com:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 11:59:09 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Trying to bring a bit more attention to this:
Fedora is pushing to have higher resolution icons for the applications.
There
already is CMakeSetup128.png, but
Hello Brad,
Sorry for the delay.
On 22/10/14 17:18, Brad King wrote:
How about a new option like CMAKE_CACHE_DEFAULT_ARGS for that?
I just pushed a new ExternalProject_CMAKE_CACHE_DEFAULT_ARGS topic, can
you please review it?
Cheers,
Daniele
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep
I would say yes, too.
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 3:27 AM, Daniel Pfeifer dan...@pfeifer-mail.de
wrote:
2014-10-27 21:33 GMT+01:00 Ben Boeckel ben.boec...@kitware.com:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 11:59:09 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Trying to bring a bit more attention to this:
Fedora is
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=15222
==
Reported By:Charles Karney
Assigned To:
On 10/27/2014 01:59 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Fedora is pushing to have higher resolution icons for the applications. There
already is CMakeSetup128.png, but these would need to get installed into the
proper /usr/share/icons/ hierarchy and named appropriately for the correct
size to be
On 10/27/2014 09:11 AM, Brad King wrote:
Tests: Run Tutorial steps 1-4 as tests for Windows CE
http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=e690d0db
Please take a look at the test failures on your dashboard submission
for these tests.
Thanks,
-Brad
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
On 10/27/2014 09:11 AM, Brad King wrote:
Tests: Run Tutorial steps 1-4 as tests for Windows CE
http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=e690d0db
Please take a look at the test failures on your dashboard submission
for these tests.
I'm already on it. I will let you know if
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=15223
==
Reported By:Emmanuel Blot
Assigned To:
On 10/28/2014 08:18 AM, Brad King wrote:
On 10/27/2014 01:59 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Fedora is pushing to have higher resolution icons for the applications. There
already is CMakeSetup128.png, but these would need to get installed into the
proper /usr/share/icons/ hierarchy and named
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com
wrote:
There should be a series in:
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/XxX/apps/CMakeSetup.png
Where XxX is the resolution, eg: 32x32, 48x48,... :
ls /usr/share/icons/hicolor
128x128 192x192 22x22 256x256 36x36 512x512
On 10/28/2014 06:48 AM, Daniele E. Domenichelli wrote:
I just pushed a new ExternalProject_CMAKE_CACHE_DEFAULT_ARGS topic, can
you please review it?
Good. After seeing the lack of a clean place to document the
differences among these options I decided it is time to revise
the documentation
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=15225
==
Reported By:Ilya
Assigned To:
I am proud to announce that CMake 3.1 has entered the release candidate stage.
Sources and binaries are available at:
http://www.cmake.org/files/v3.1/?C=M;O=D
Documentation is available at:
http://www.cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.1
Release notes appear below and are also published at
Hi there!
As requested... I renamed the 3 APPLE variables to BUNDLE_APPLE in attached
patch.
Thanks
André Klitzing
Clinton Stimpson clin...@elemtech.com schrieb am Mon Oct 27 2014 at
17:42:50:
Hi André,
I can help you get this patch into the git repo. But before doing that,
Brad
Thanks for the patch.
Its in the repository now.
http://www.cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commit;h=bd3fbf3
Clint
On Tuesday, October 28, 2014 06:18:34 PM A. Klitzing wrote:
Hi there!
As requested... I renamed the 3 APPLE variables to BUNDLE_APPLE in attached
patch.
Thanks
André
On 28/10/14 18:01, Brad King wrote:
Please rebase on those. You should find it much easier to add
more detail to the documentation of each option.
Done, thanks.
Daniele
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
On 13-Oct-14 18:39, Brad King wrote:
With all the above in mind, please brainstorm and propose a more complete
signature set. You can use the keyword/value pairing common in other
commands to avoid needing a positional argument for every value.
What do you think about this:
file(
LOCK
17 matches
Mail list logo
