Re: [cmake-developers] Support for version suffixes

On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 11:03 PM, Roger Leigh wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'd like to bring this issue to your attention to canvas some feedback > regarding the use of version suffixes: > > https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmake/issues/16716 > > This is basically a proposal to

Re: [cmake-developers] Support for version suffixes

I remember asking for the same thing a few weeks ago on IRC because of a small behaviour change in cmake 3.8.0 rc2 that I wanted to put behind an if(version_less). Alphanumeric ordering would certainly work for most projects : alpha < beta < rc. (I generally use a0, a1, a2... b0, b1, b2...) Best

Re: [cmake-developers] Support for version suffixes

On 03/27/2017 05:03 PM, Roger Leigh wrote: > I'd like to bring this issue to your attention to canvas some feedback > regarding the use of version suffixes: > >https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmake/issues/16716 > > The proposal linked above contains a much more detailed rationale and >

Re: [cmake-developers] Support for version suffixes

On 03/28/2017 04:07 AM, Jean-Michaël Celerier wrote: > I remember asking for the same thing a few weeks ago on IRC because of > a small behaviour change in cmake 3.8.0 rc2 that I wanted to put behind > an if(version_less). For reference, this was also proposed in issue 16656 [1]. The problem is

Re: [cmake-developers] Some info about AIX needed

Hi Gregor, Please try to keep these sort of conversations on the dev list to ensure that others can benefit from or contribute to the discussion as well. I just checked on the AIX 7.2 dashboard machine. Here's the output from all possible uname switches described in the manpage: uname -a AIX