Re: [cmake-developers] User vs CMake include mismatch handling

2010-10-12 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 10/12/2010 6:01 PM, Marcus D. Hanwell wrote: On Tuesday 12 October 2010 17:27:31 David Cole wrote: On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Brad King wrote: On 10/12/2010 03:32 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote: On Tuesday 12 October 2010, Bill Hoffman wrote: Anyway, in the short term, we are going to

Re: [cmake-developers] User vs CMake include mismatch handling

2010-10-12 Thread Marcus D. Hanwell
On Tuesday 12 October 2010 17:27:31 David Cole wrote: > On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Brad King wrote: > > On 10/12/2010 03:32 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > > On Tuesday 12 October 2010, Bill Hoffman wrote: > > >> Anyway, in the short term, we are going to go with FPHSA2, Alex do you > > >>

Re: [cmake-developers] User vs CMake include mismatch handling

2010-10-12 Thread David Cole
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Brad King wrote: > On 10/12/2010 03:32 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > On Tuesday 12 October 2010, Bill Hoffman wrote: > >> Anyway, in the short term, we are going to go with FPHSA2, Alex do you > >> have time to do that? > > > > FPHSA2 would have been my last c

Re: [cmake-developers] User vs CMake include mismatch handling

2010-10-12 Thread Brad King
On 10/12/2010 03:32 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote: > On Tuesday 12 October 2010, Bill Hoffman wrote: >> Anyway, in the short term, we are going to go with FPHSA2, Alex do you >> have time to do that? > > FPHSA2 would have been my last choice. > > In staging there is already the branch AddCMAKE_CURR

Re: [cmake-developers] User vs CMake include mismatch handling

2010-10-12 Thread Eric Noulard
2010/10/12 Alexander Neundorf : > On Tuesday 12 October 2010, Marcus D. Hanwell wrote: >> 2010/10/12 Alexander Neundorf > >> It has its own copy of FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake, which is used >> in some of the Find modules. Avogadro is a dependency of Kalzium (KDE Edu), >> but is C++/Qt bas

Re: [cmake-developers] User vs CMake include mismatch handling

2010-10-12 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Tuesday 12 October 2010, Bill Hoffman wrote: > > Remaining are as far as I see: > > > > -set new policy CMP0017 to NEW by default > > Projects with an exotic setup may break, but that's probably better than > > breaking all KDE 4.5.0/1 builds. One could also argue that these projects > > relied

Re: [cmake-developers] User vs CMake include mismatch handling

2010-10-12 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Tuesday 12 October 2010, Alan W. Irwin wrote: ... > cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 2.8.3 FATAL_ERROR) > > because you absolutely need CMP0017. I believe most projects > (including PLplot) will eventually need that policy as well because > there is a tendency to copy and modify CMake find module

Re: [cmake-developers] User vs CMake include mismatch handling

2010-10-12 Thread Bill Hoffman
Remaining are as far as I see: -set new policy CMP0017 to NEW by default Projects with an exotic setup may break, but that's probably better than breaking all KDE 4.5.0/1 builds. One could also argue that these projects relied on internal implementation details of cmake. As a pro, I think this

Re: [cmake-developers] User vs CMake include mismatch handling

2010-10-12 Thread Marcus D. Hanwell
2010/10/12 Alexander Neundorf > On Tuesday 12 October 2010, Marcus D. Hanwell wrote: > > 2010/10/12 Alexander Neundorf > > > > > On Tuesday 12 October 2010, Marcus D. Hanwell wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Alexander Neundorf < > neund...@kde.org > > > >wrote: > > > > > > ... > >

Re: [cmake-developers] User vs CMake include mismatch handling

2010-10-12 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2010-10-12 19:38+0200 Alexander Neundorf wrote: Remaining are as far as I see: -set new policy CMP0017 to NEW by default Projects with an exotic setup may break, but that's probably better than breaking all KDE 4.5.0/1 builds. One could also argue that these projects relied on internal imple

Re: [cmake-developers] User vs CMake include mismatch handling

2010-10-12 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Tuesday 12 October 2010, Marcus D. Hanwell wrote: > 2010/10/12 Alexander Neundorf > > > On Tuesday 12 October 2010, Marcus D. Hanwell wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Alexander Neundorf > >wrote: > > > > ... > > > > > > Personally, I would try a rc3 with CMP0017 set to NEW and see

Re: [cmake-developers] User vs CMake include mismatch handling

2010-10-12 Thread Marcus D. Hanwell
2010/10/12 Alexander Neundorf > On Tuesday 12 October 2010, Marcus D. Hanwell wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Alexander Neundorf >wrote: > ... > > > Personally, I would try a rc3 with CMP0017 set to NEW and see how it > > > goes. It works for kdelibs and for our project at work (whic

Re: [cmake-developers] User vs CMake include mismatch handling

2010-10-12 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Tuesday 12 October 2010, Marcus D. Hanwell wrote: > On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote: ... > > Personally, I would try a rc3 with CMP0017 set to NEW and see how it > > goes. It works for kdelibs and for our project at work (which doesn't > > have a lot of > > fancy cmake

[cmake-developers] [CMake 0011307]: Xcode generator does not recognise *.hh files correctly

2010-10-12 Thread Mantis Bug Tracker
The following issue has been SUBMITTED. == http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=11307 == Reported By:dsieger Assigned To: