The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=11910
==
Reported By:Raymond Wan
Assigned To:
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=11913
==
Reported By:Brendan Wilson
Assigned To:
On 3/1/2011 3:05 AM, Biddiscombe, John A. wrote:
should I be looking at cmVisualStudio10TargetGenerator, or
cmGlobalVisualStudio10Generator/cmGlobalVisualStudio10Win64Generator or
one of the base classes?
I didn't get any reply to this, so I would like to ask instead
There is a VisualStudio
On 03/01/2011 03:44 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
The SunPro tests both failed:
http://www.cdash.org/CDash/testDetails.php?test=85204365build=884706
http://www.cdash.org/CDash/testDetails.php?test=85247010build=884931
The assembler file was generated in both cases, but could not be linked.
On Tuesday 01 March 2011, Brad King wrote:
On 03/01/2011 03:44 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
The SunPro tests both failed:
http://www.cdash.org/CDash/testDetails.php?test=85204365build=884706
http://www.cdash.org/CDash/testDetails.php?test=85247010build=884931
The assembler file was
On 3/1/2011 4:47 PM, Brad King wrote:
On 03/01/2011 04:40 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
Do you think when enabling the C compiler as ASM compiler it should
also check for $ENV{CFLAGS} ? Or should I added $ENV{ASMFLAGS} ?
Often the C compiler is the C++ compiler too but we still have a