[cmake-developers] [CMake 0013116]: Cmake Nmake generator generate empty /MACHINE:for first run under a project

2012-04-09 Thread Mantis Bug Tracker
The following issue has been SUBMITTED. == http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=13116 == Reported By:hume npx Assigned To:

Re: [cmake-developers] portable way for linking (single) libraries statically or dynamically

2012-04-09 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
On Mon, 2012-04-09 at 13:41 -0400, Brad King wrote: > I'm not commenting either way. I'm just saying that is what may > need to be done to address your concerns. Well I mean it's rather obvious that I personally miss far to much insight in the inner workings of CMake to push/implement such big cha

Re: [cmake-developers] FindCXX11.cmake

2012-04-09 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 23:44:23 +0400, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote: > # check for two required features > check_cxx11_features(feature1 feature2 REQUIRED) Why not have REQUIRED first? It would make more sense with the next syntax. > # check for optional AND required features > check_cxx11_features

Re: [cmake-developers] FindCXX11.cmake

2012-04-09 Thread Brad King
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote: Brad King wrote: Neat. I like the change to "CheckCXX11Features" instead of "FindCXX11". OK. I want some way to explicitly state the required and optional C++11 features, and don't waste CPU checking for other features. Right. I f

Re: [cmake-developers] FindCXX11.cmake

2012-04-09 Thread Yury G. Kudryashov
Brad King wrote: > On 4/6/2012 12:11 PM, Rolf Eike Beer wrote: >> Attached is what I currently have. > > Neat. I like the change to "CheckCXX11Features" instead of "FindCXX11". OK. I want some way to explicitly state the required and optional C++11 features, and don't waste CPU checking for oth

Re: [cmake-developers] FindCXX11.cmake

2012-04-09 Thread Brad King
On 4/6/2012 12:11 PM, Rolf Eike Beer wrote: Attached is what I currently have. Neat. I like the change to "CheckCXX11Features" instead of "FindCXX11". I'd prefer that the result variable names start in "CXX11_", so HAS_CXX11_STATIC_ASSERT would be CXX11_HAS_STATIC_ASSERT Please draft

Re: [cmake-developers] portable way for linking (single) libraries statically or dynamically

2012-04-09 Thread Brad King
On 4/5/2012 10:30 PM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: This would need to be done in two pieces. The first piece is the language runtime libraries. CMake uses the compiler front-end to invoke the linker so language runtime libraries are implicitly linked. Special flags to tell the compiler which r

[cmake-developers] [CMake 0013114]: CPack segfaults if too many people belong to a certain group

2012-04-09 Thread Mantis Bug Tracker
The following issue has been SUBMITTED. == http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=13114 == Reported By:Cesar Assigned To: =

[cmake-developers] [CMake 0013113]: document behaviour for repeated calls to target_link_libraries()

2012-04-09 Thread Mantis Bug Tracker
The following issue has been SUBMITTED. == http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=13113 == Reported By:Sylwester Arabas Assigned To:

[cmake-developers] [CMake 0013112]: Support for Unix Makefiles with DOS Paths

2012-04-09 Thread Mantis Bug Tracker
The following issue has been SUBMITTED. == http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=13112 == Reported By:A. Saratow Assigned To: =