Re: [cmake-developers] setting LINKER_LANGUAGE still adds -lstdc++

2012-10-09 Thread James Bigler
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:40 PM, James Bigler jamesbig...@gmail.com wrote: In my project I need to manually link against a special version of libstdc++, so I manually set the target link language to C and then add my special library to the link line. On Linux this seems to work just fine,

Re: [cmake-developers] setting LINKER_LANGUAGE still adds -lstdc++

2012-10-09 Thread Brad King
On 10/09/2012 01:59 AM, James Bigler wrote: On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:40 PM, James Bigler jamesbig...@gmail.com mailto:jamesbig...@gmail.com wrote: In my project I need to manually link against a special version of libstdc++ add_library(a SHARED a.cpp) set_target_properties(a

[cmake-developers] [CMake 0013579]: FortranCInterface.cmake does not pass CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE flags

2012-10-09 Thread Mantis Bug Tracker
The following issue has been SUBMITTED. == http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=13579 == Reported By:Jordan Lefebvre Assigned To:

[cmake-developers] Testing that solution contains what it should

2012-10-09 Thread Petr Kmoch
Hi all, I have a question about tests of CMake itself. I'd like to create a new feature patch and I would definitely want to supply tests with it. Is there a standard mechanism (perhaps something like the macro check_cmake_test()) to test that a generated buildsystem (specifically, Visual Studio

Re: [cmake-developers] Testing that solution contains what it should

2012-10-09 Thread Brad King
On 10/09/2012 04:32 PM, Petr Kmoch wrote: Is there a standard mechanism (perhaps something like the macro check_cmake_test()) to test that a generated buildsystem (specifically, Visual Studio solution) contains what it should? If not, are there some test for this which I could take