The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=14352
==
Reported By:chrislu
Assigned To:
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=14353
==
Reported By:chrislu
Assigned To:
Stephen Kelly wrote:
I still think you should revisit my review mail on point 2 too.
Something that becomes possible when thinking about the above and target
properties is interface requirements.
If my library uses 'final' unguarded by macros in my headers, then I want to
communicate through
On 08/02/2013 05:20 PM, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Brad, please don't merge that
Do all of the remaining test failures need the cxx-flags topic to fix?
http://open.cdash.org/testSummary.php?project=1name=Module.FindCXXFeaturesdate=2013-08-13
I'd like to get these resolved or revert the topic
Brad King wrote:
On 08/02/2013 05:20 PM, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Brad, please don't merge that
Do all of the remaining test failures need the cxx-flags topic to fix?
No, since both are in next already everything that still shows up as a bug is
a bug.
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=14355
==
Reported By:Daniel Schepler
Assigned To:
*Dynamic analysis tests failing or not run*
CTestTestMemcheckDummyPurify
(http://open.cdash.org/viewDynamicAnalysisFile.php?id=2977143)
CTestTestMemcheckDummyValgrind
(http://open.cdash.org/viewDynamicAnalysisFile.php?id=2977144)
CTestTestMemcheckDummyValgrindIgnoreMemcheck
