Hello,
I'd like to help maintain the orphaned module FindSWIG [1].
I'll plan on fixing #0013449 [2].
[1] http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake:Module_Maintainers
[2] http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=13449
Regards,
--
Julien Schueller
Phimeca Engineering
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=14577
==
Reported By:Soeren Freudiger
Assigned To:
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=14578
==
Reported By:Bjoern Thiel
Assigned To:
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=14579
==
Reported By:Adrien Bruneton
Assigned To:
Hello,
Please review the topic ExternalProject_GitUpdate
ExternalProject handles git remote branches by commit hash. Due to this,
the git repository ends in detached states, and local commits are discarded.
This patch uses git pull --rebase for remote branches instead of git
checkout. If there
On 15/11/13 17:41, Brad King wrote:
On 11/15/2013 03:27 AM, Daniele E. Domenichelli wrote:
So I believe that some more documentation would be helpful... If you
agree, I can write it...
Fine with me! One reason we changed to the rst-formatted documentation
is to make it easier to write and
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=14580
==
Reported By:Lars
Assigned To:
On 11/15/2013 11:39 AM, Brad King wrote:
The policy has not been released yet so I think it would be fine
to extend it to cover this. Please include documentation and
test cases.
Thanks for working on this. Here are some comments.
It looks like you added the reserved check to
On 11/18/2013 03:03 AM, Julien Schueller wrote:
I'd like to help maintain the orphaned module FindSWIG [1].
I'll plan on fixing #0013449 [2].
[1] http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake:Module_Maintainers
[2] http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=13449
Great, thanks for volunteering!
Please
On 11/15/2013 11:39 AM, Brad King wrote:
It looks like you added the reserved check to cmGeneratorExpression
in the IsValidTargetName method. This method is used in other
places to validate generator expression syntax, and in those places
the reserved target names may be allowed.
Can I keep the
Hi Daniele,
This is a great improvement. It is so easy to loose local change to an
external project A made while debugging/tweaking it for a better
interaction into an other project B with B depending on A.
Will give a try and let you know how it goes.
Thanks
Jc
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 6:19
I am understanding properly that the last paragraph properly, this will fix
the problem that setting GIT_TAG to a named branch doesn't keep the branch
up to date with the remotes version of the branch?
Overall I really like this change to ExternalProject, and I see it being
more in line with how
Hi Daniele,
Thanks for the contribution!
Code review looks good -- I like how there is a reset --hard to the
previous head_sha and message if the stash pop does not work as
expected.
I have checkout out the branch, will test it locally, and make any
notes of unexpected behavior.
Thanks,
Matt
On 11/18/2013 08:41 AM, Daniele E. Domenichelli wrote:
Done, see topic macro-args-docs.
Good start.
Please place the :: starting a literal block at the end of
the previous paragraph when the block is part of the paragraph.
For example:
+Therefore you will NOT be able to use commands like:
+
On 11/12/2013 10:10 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
Brad King wrote:
1. Revert the target_compile_features topic until this is resolved.
Done. Rebased to master and pushed to my clone.
Okay, thanks.
2. Create a new topic that adds a *test* in which you build the
new infrastructure. (This way
Hi,
We've had a while now to get used to the new docs system. Mostly I like it,
though I haven't really looked much into what rst offers.
1) Indentation
Something that I liked about the previous system was that the output from
cmake --help-* was indented. Can we indent the rst output too?
2)
On 11/18/2013 02:56 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
We've had a while now to get used to the new docs system. Mostly I like it,
though I haven't really looked much into what rst offers.
This is really the start of several threads so I will branch out now.
1) Indentation
Something that I liked
On 11/18/2013 02:56 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
We've had a while now to get used to the new docs system. Mostly I like it,
though I haven't really looked much into what rst offers.
This is really the start of several threads so I will branch out now.
3) Language documentation
Note there is
On Monday 18 November 2013, Brad King wrote:
On 11/18/2013 02:56 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
We've had a while now to get used to the new docs system. Mostly I like
it, though I haven't really looked much into what rst offers.
This is really the start of several threads so I will branch out
If you are at Denver this week for IEEE Supercomputing
(http://www.supercomp.org), please stop by our booth (#4207) and say
hello. There will be CMake and software process experts available to
discuss best
practices and new developments in CMake/CTest/CPack and CDash. We'd
like to hear about what
On 18/11/13 16:39, Robert Maynard wrote:
I am understanding properly that the last paragraph properly, this will
fix the problem that setting GIT_TAG to a named branch doesn't keep the
branch up to date with the remotes version of the branch?
Yes, exactly... setting GIT_TAG to master (or any
Hello Brad,
On 18/11/13 18:44, Brad King wrote:
Please place the :: starting a literal block at the end of
the previous paragraph when the block is part of the paragraph.
[...]
Also please use ``inline-code-example`` syntax for text referring
to constructs from the literal blocks.
[...]
22 matches
Mail list logo
