Re: [cmake-developers] RFC: add version to project() call
On Tuesday 21 January 2014, Stephen Kelly wrote: > Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > On Sunday 19 January 2014, Stephen Kelly wrote: > >> Alexander Neundorf wrote: > >> > This is now in the AddVersionToProjectCommand branch on git stage. > >> > > >> > Please have a close look at it. > >> > >> The documentation is not formatted correctly as rst. > > > > I looked at the generated html file, it seemed to look ok. > > What's wrong with it ? > > +# If no VERSION is given, the version number specified via > +# project(... VERSION x.y.z ...) is used. If this hasn't been set, it > errors > +# out. > > ... to: > > specified via :command:`project(VERSION)` > > I didn't look for other problems or opportunities for better docs. I just > noticed that, and it indicates you haven't looked into what can/should be > done with rst yet. I suggest you look for those opportunities. Ah, ok. Is it actually recommended to use some formatting, like bold or italic or something else ? Alex -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
Re: [cmake-developers] Order of linking libraries
On 01/22/2014 06:52 AM, J Decker wrote: > On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 2:31 AM, Marcin Maslany > wrote: >> what's the order of linking libraries? Is it always deterministic? I know it >> is possible to build dependency graph on libraries with cmake and find the >> correct order with topological sorting (this might be the way you do it). Yes, this is the way to do it. >> I am just courius what is the reason of different order, even if I use the >> same machine to build binary. The order in which make chooses to build independent libraries does not influence the order of their appearance on the link line of consuming targets. > It's in the same order as it is specified; if the same configuration > options are used, it should be the same list always. The implementation is here: http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=blob;f=Source/cmComputeLinkDepends.cxx;hb=v2.8.12.1 Read the giant comment at the top of the file to see how the ordering algorithm works. When it refers to the "user specified" order it means the order in target_link_libraries calls. -Brad -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
[cmake-developers] [CMake 0014716]: CMake installer can't modify %PATH% if it's 'loo long'.
The following issue has been SUBMITTED. == http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=14716 == Reported By:iljau Assigned To: == Project:CMake Issue ID: 14716 Category: CMakeSetup Reproducibility:sometimes Severity: minor Priority: normal Status: new == Date Submitted: 2014-01-22 08:30 EST Last Modified: 2014-01-22 08:30 EST == Summary:CMake installer can't modify %PATH% if it's 'loo long'. Description: CMake windows installer fails to add installation directory to %PATH% if contents of %PATH% environment variable are above some hardcoded limit. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Fill your user %PATH% environment variable with something long (in my case 466 characters). 2. Run installer. 3. Select "Add CMake to the system PATH for current user" in the installer. 4. Click "Next >" 5. After installing cmake, following window pops up: "Warning! PATH too long installer unable to modify PATH!" == Issue History Date ModifiedUsername FieldChange == 2014-01-22 08:30 iljau New Issue == -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
Re: [cmake-developers] Order of linking libraries
It's in the same order as it is specified; if the same configuration options are used, it should be the same list always. IF things are somehow installed differently maybe; but the installed libraries should still be located in the same order. It is the same order for all generators. The order of objects is always the order they are specified. On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 2:31 AM, Marcin Maslany wrote: > Hello, > > what's the order of linking libraries? Is it always deterministic? I know it > is possible to build dependency graph on libraries with cmake and find the > correct order with topological sorting (this might be the way you do it). > > However, when I check the output from two builds (one after another) using > cmake I can see that order is not always the same. I mean when I compare > phrases "Linking C/CXX static library ..". Even if I run make with only one > job. > > I totally agree that it still produces the correct binary, but I'd like to > know if it's possible to ensure that the linking order of libraries is (no > matter what machine I am running it on) deterministic? Of course, other than > adding fake dependencies. > > I am just courius what is the reason of different order, even if I use the > same machine to build binary. > > BR, Marcin Maslany > > -- > > Powered by www.kitware.com > > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html > > Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: > http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ > > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: > http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
[cmake-developers] Order of linking libraries
Hello, what's the order of linking libraries? Is it always deterministic? I know it is possible to build dependency graph on libraries with cmake and find the correct order with topological sorting (this might be the way you do it). However, when I check the output from two builds (one after another) using cmake I can see that order is not always the same. I mean when I compare phrases "Linking C/CXX static library ..". Even if I run make with only one job. I totally agree that it still produces the correct binary, but I'd like to know if it's possible to ensure that the linking order of libraries is (no matter what machine I am running it on) deterministic? Of course, other than adding fake dependencies. I am just courius what is the reason of different order, even if I use the same machine to build binary. BR, Marcin Maslany -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
