The first time you need to checkout next, you should do:
git checkout -b next origin/next
which will set it up as a local branch that tracks the remote
'origin/next' branch...
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Mathieu Malaterre
mathieu.malate...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
I discover that
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 6:21 PM, Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.comwrote:
2010/8/12 Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.com:
2010/8/11 David Cole david.c...@kitware.com:
We branch from the commit that was merged into next, not next itself, to
continue work that was begun based on master
in and stabilized by the end
of the day on Monday, Sept. 13.
Please do not add anything else to the list for fixing in 2.8.3 unless it is
a serious regression in behavior from previous CMake releases.
Thanks,
David Cole
Kitware, Inc.
___
cmake-developers
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 5:15 AM, Michael Wild them...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19. Sep, 2010, at 11:03 , Alexander Neundorf wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently cleaning up my local CMake branches.
What is a good way to find out whether some branch has been merged into
master ? Right now I was
Please merge the fix to next now and add the test later when you get the
chance.
We definitely need this fix before the final release even if it's still
untested.
Thanks,
David
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.comwrote:
2010/9/20 Eric Noulard
I think this has to be fixed before we make 2.8.3 final. The existing (2.8.2
and earlier) behavior here is crucial for anybody who has multiple Qt
versions installed or available...
Clinton, do you have time to take a look at this in the next couple of days?
Thanks,
David Cole
On Thu, Sep 23
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Alexander Neundorf neund...@kde.orgwrote:
On Wednesday 13 October 2010, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Wednesday 13 October 2010, Bill Hoffman wrote:
So, I think we have to use the new name approach. Do we want to call
it
2? Or should we call it
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 1:36 PM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.comwrote:
On 10/14/2010 2:18 PM, David Cole wrote:
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Alexander Neundorf neund...@kde.org
mailto:neund...@kde.org wrote
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Marcus D. Hanwell
marcus.hanw...@kitware.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 1:59 PM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com
wrote:
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 1:36 PM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com
wrote:
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Bill Hoffman
Yes, the rc3 was announced last week.
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Alexander Neundorf neund...@kde.orgwrote:
Hi,
how are the cmake RCs doing ?
I didn't see an announcement for a 2.8.3 RC3, did I miss it ?
(I'm waiting for it so I can announce it to the KDE developers to give it
some
Re-sending as plain text; the first time around, it got redirected to
the universe's bit bucket...
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 6:04 PM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
The CMake 2.8.3 release candidate stream continues!
You can find the source and binaries here:
http://www.cmake.org
)
Bill Hoffman (1):
When processing DartMeasurements use the tests working directory.
David Cole (2):
ExternalProject: No svn --username if empty (#11173)
Avoid problem reading jni.h on Macs.
David Partyka (5):
Fixed appending PATH to dumpbin tool from growing without bounds
, we need the test to be reliable. As it stands, I'm
leaning towards disabling the test on xmllint installs that do not
support --nonet.
Any HTML / xmllint experts out there that can chime in and point out
what's wrong so we can get it fixed?
Thanks,
David Cole
wrote:
On Tuesday 28 September 2010, David Cole wrote:
Ambitious. I like it.
I would prefer seeing this implemented as a CMake-language function. And
You mean to implement this as a cmake script, and not as a built-in function ?
adding anything necessary to CMake in order to support
I just merged this commit into 'next' :
http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=bb1df1ec8ea880c9859845b85828b8b724abb1ba
It will definitively highlight for us all the submitting dashboard
machines that are *not* using the --nonet argument to xmllint.
Then, after tomorrow's run, we can
Try p=automoc.git not just p=automoc
Works for me:
http://gitweb.kde.org/gitweb?p=automoc.git;a=blob_plain;f=CTestConfig.cmake;hb=HEAD
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Alexander Neundorf neund...@kde.org wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently playing around with ctest and git/gitweb.
For our KDE nightly
I will keep going with this on Monday
It was my intent to make the test fail last night on platforms where
we could not determine the processor count, so we'd get a good sense
of how much work remains for the platforms not yet accounted for. But
I messed up the test a bit.
I'll correct that,
QNX dashboard running,
but they do not seem to be reporting for the last few days.
Thanks,
David
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 4:52 PM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
I will keep going with this on Monday
It was my intent to make the test fail last night on platforms where
we could
- Sun
Otherwise, this function may end up being useful only for Linux, Mac, QNX
and Windows...
Thanks for your patience while this is under development.
David Cole
Kitware, Inc.
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 12:38 PM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
Hi Rolf,
Can you update to a CMake based
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com wrote:
On 11/8/2010 3:30 PM, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Am Montag, 8. November 2010 schrieb Bill Hoffman:
On 11/8/2010 1:55 PM, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Am Montag, 8. November 2010 schrieb David Cole:
Hi Rolf,
Can you update
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 5:45 AM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com wrote:
On 11/8/2010 3:30 PM, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Am Montag, 8. November 2010 schrieb Bill Hoffman:
On 11/8/2010 1:55 PM, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Am
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/11/14 Alexander Neundorf neund...@kde.org:
Hi,
the AddASM_NASMSupport branch (#10069) in staging is now good enough to be
merged into next (or master ?).
How does that happen ?
Should I simply ignore staging
Read all about it:
http://www.kitware.com/blog/home/post/82
Cheers,
David Cole
Kitware, Inc.
___
cmake-developers mailing list
cmake-developers@cmake.org
http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Alexander Neundorf neund...@kde.org wrote:
On Friday 03 December 2010, David Cole wrote:
Hello CMake devs,
If you're on the To line, then you have at least one bug assigned to
you in the bug tracker that is slated to be addressed in the CMake
2.8.4 release
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/12/9 David Cole david.c...@kitware.com:
Hello CMake users and devs,
(And now for something completely different...)
Controversial questions:
- Should we eliminate the bug tracker entirely and just do all
Did you ever investigate using CPACK_PROJECT_CONFIG_FILE to avoid
doing the silly regex MATCHES test, and just define your own variable
that (for now) tells you for sure that you're in a CPack run...?
I think we discussed that one about a month ago, IIRC.
Thanks,
David
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at
Thanks for the suggestion.
I just committed this change and pushed it to 'next':
http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=66d9cd83519962f320d4b6edefeb15ae250107ae
Cheers,
David
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 4:58 AM, Johan Björk p...@spotify.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
The Makefile
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote:
On 1/18/2011 1:50 PM, Manuel Klimek wrote:
Since this is a big integration style test, is it also possible to
integrate a python test? (the whole test would fit into a few lines of
python then)
We'd prefer not to
Thanks, Johan.
I just committed your patch and pushed it to 'next':
http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=b08657cf0fbe2d02d87a866e7c2dfc29f8d80571
Avoiding crashes. Big fan.
I think all toolchain files are intended for use with only Makefile
generators at this point... isn't that
.
:-)
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:41 PM, James Bigler jamesbig...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, I was talking about VS 2008. I see that file now.
What do you mean by compensated for by other code?
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 3:39 PM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.comwrote:
I assume you're talking about
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 4:20 AM, Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.comwrote:
2011/1/29 James Bigler jamesbig...@gmail.com:
On Jan 28, 2011, at 5:21 PM, Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.com
wrote:
2011/1/29 James Bigler jamesbig...@gmail.com:
I can't seem to be able to push to stage. I
When you are logged in to Mantis, there should be a Monitor button right
under where you see a link to the patch that you attached...
Is there no Monitor button there?
(You may already be monitoring it if you attached a patch. I'm pretty sure
that anybody who ever edits a bug is automatically
test expected results
Clinton Stimpson (1):
Replace exec_program with execute_process for qmake queries.
David Cole (16):
Update script with new machine name
VS10: Fix problems with InstallRequiredSystemLibraries.
Add CMAKE_INSTALL_SYSTEM_RUNTIME_LIBS_NO_WARNINGS variable
Hello CMakers,
The CMake issue tracker is located at:
http://public.kitware.com/Bug
All of the issues except for the most recent 15 or so have been assigned and
looked at by at least one CMake developer at one point in each issue's
history. However, not all issues that are assigned to developers
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 4:22 AM, Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/2/4 Michael Wild them...@gmail.com:
You could actually add a backlog status by customising the
configuration:
http://manual.mantisbt.org/manual.customizing.mantis.customizing.status.values.php
This would
Don't you mean:
LIST(GET FOO 0 TEST)
FOO is the file(STRINGS result. test is the filename...
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Johan Björk p...@spotify.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
It seems the FILE(STRINGS) function does not properly return a list when
there is only one item.
Example cmake
(#11833)
David Cole (1):
Silence the may be used uninitialized warnings: initialize stuff.
Eric NOULARD (2):
CPack Tests the different ways of packaging components
Avoid foreach IN LISTS syntax which is not supported by CMake 2.6
Changes in CMake 2.8.4-rc2 (since 2.8.4-rc1
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote:
On 02/18/2011 10:00 AM, Johan Björk wrote:
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Brad King wrote:
(1) Hard-code --recursive and add a check to error out if the Git
version is not new enough.
(2) seems both complicated
applied in a wrong way:
commit 99ddf6a12d54854ae4f27eecd592fef5cb22640f
Author: David Cole david.c...@kitware.com
Date: Wed Jan 5 15:38:52 2011 -0500
KWSys: Retrieve QNX specific memory and processor info (#11329)
Author: Rolf Eike Beer e...@sf-mail.de 2010-10-18 12:03:39
commit
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.comwrote:
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Biddiscombe, John A. biddi...@cscs.ch
wrote:
Or, maybe only use it for fortran, but that would be hard...
Ah. That was going to be my next question. I wanted to know how to get
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Alexander Neundorf neund...@kde.orgwrote:
On Friday 04 February 2011, David Cole wrote:
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 4:22 AM, Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.com
wrote:
2011/2/4 Michael Wild them...@gmail.com:
You could actually add a backlog status
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 3:21 PM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Alexander Neundorf neund...@kde.orgwrote:
On Friday 04 February 2011, David Cole wrote:
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 4:22 AM, Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.com
wrote:
2011/2/4 Michael
Thanks. Looks reasonable. Merged/pushed to next:
http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=fcf3208ac10942344d4e7302ca8351758ba26978
Expect it in the next release.
thx,
David
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 4:51 AM, Rolf Eike Beer e...@sf-mail.de wrote:
Hi,
we had a lot of fun debugging our
-- we will
be looking at the mailing list and activity in the bug tracker to help
prioritize the bug fixes that will occur over the next 4 weeks.
Thanks,
David Cole
Kitware, Inc.
P.S. - as a nice summary of what we accomplished in the CMake 2.8.4 release,
see here: http://public.kitware.com/Bug
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Clinton Stimpson clin...@elemtech.comwrote:
On Thursday, April 07, 2011 10:29:41 am Mike McQuaid wrote:
On 7 April 2011 17:17, Clinton Stimpson clin...@elemtech.com wrote:
That could be a good way to go first. If the need arises, we could
introduce more
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:23 PM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Clinton Stimpson clin...@elemtech.comwrote:
On Thursday, April 07, 2011 10:29:41 am Mike McQuaid wrote:
On 7 April 2011 17:17, Clinton Stimpson clin...@elemtech.com wrote:
That could
2011/4/28 Nicolas Desprès nicolas.desp...@gmail.com
2011/4/27 Alexander Neundorf neund...@kde.org:
On Wednesday 27 April 2011, Nicolas Desprès wrote:
Hi,
I'm experimenting with the variables available in script mode in the
current master (a3a581f8cd):
CMAKE_SCRIPT_MODE_FILE
methods into an enum.
Add component support to DragNDrop generator.
David Cole (34):
ExternalProject Test: Increase test timeout value
CFBundle Test: Add PATHS for finding Rez (#11295)
CTest: Mark DART_TESTING_TIMEOUT as advanced (#10150)
Xcode: Allow override
This patch can't quite be right.
After this patch, the value of CMAKE_OSX_SYSROOT will be:
macosx10.5;STRING;PATH;The product will be built agai...
You meant to change the PATH to a STRING I think -- but even so,
this change should have no actual effect on the behavior of CMake. The
type of a
It is unexpected (and user/pilot error, if encountered) to have
multiple INSTALL_DIR arguments to ExternalProject_Add.
Why do you have to override the function in order to achieve your goal?
Most ExternalProject arguments have reasonable default values for the
corresponding properties, and can
The CMake 2.8.5 release candidate stream continues! You can find the
source and binaries here: http://www.cmake.org/files/v2.8/?C=M;O=D
I hope this will be the last release candidate for CMake 2.8.5. We'll build
and release 2.8.5 this week unless somebody reports a must fix major
regression from
Sounds like a spam-bot or something here... Very strange.
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 6:20 AM, Michael Wild them...@gmail.com wrote:
Five times the same useless report, each reported by a different user-id?!
Michael
On 07/16/2011 06:29 AM, Mantis Bug Tracker wrote:
The following issue has been
patch. It seems to work with the project I happened to
have open; it's not tested more then that. You know the xcode generator a
whole lot better then me; does it seem reasonable?
Thanks
/Johan
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 7:31 PM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
Sounds like we need
Stephen,
The test you recently added is failing on many platforms on the CMake
dashboard today. Are you working on resolving these test failures?
This output:
*** Exception executing: Exit code 0xc135
means that one of the dlls could not be loaded properly by the built
executable. Are you
Make that CMAKE_RUNTIME_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY ...
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 1:58 PM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
Stephen,
The test you recently added is failing on many platforms on the CMake
dashboard today. Are you working on resolving these test failures?
This output
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Alexander Neundorf neund...@kde.orgwrote:
On Monday 08 August 2011, Brad King wrote:
On 8/8/2011 4:24 AM, Johan Björk wrote:
This has been discussed a billion times, so I'll keep it short.
Problem: Some parts of the build requires a environment
2011/8/16 Alexander Neundorf neund...@kde.org:
On Tuesday 16 August 2011, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Tuesday 16 August 2011, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
...
There is now a branch AutomocForQt on the cmake stage.
Docs and a test are still missing.
It has a test now. Docs are still
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Alexander Neundorf neund...@kde.org wrote:
On Tuesday 16 August 2011, David Cole wrote:
2011/8/16 Alexander Neundorf neund...@kde.org:
On Tuesday 16 August 2011, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Tuesday 16 August 2011, Alexander Neundorf wrote
Thanks -- I had noticed that and had it on my list to write the very same code.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Johan Björk p...@spotify.com wrote:
PREBINDING has been obsoleted for a long time, and starting with Xcode 4,
having the setting is treated as a warning.
Attached patch stops
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 6:19 PM, James Bigler jamesbig...@gmail.com wrote:
I recently switched to 2.8.5 and noticed something strange.
I have several files that build into a Debug|Release agnostic place. If I
build it in one then switch to the other the files don't regenerate, because
the
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 1:30 PM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 6:19 PM, James Bigler jamesbig...@gmail.com wrote:
I recently switched to 2.8.5 and noticed something strange.
I have several files that build into a Debug|Release agnostic place. If I
build
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 4:56 PM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 1:30 PM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 6:19 PM, James Bigler jamesbig...@gmail.com wrote:
I recently switched to 2.8.5 and noticed something strange.
I have
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com wrote:
David Cole wrote:
Stephen,
Welcome to CMake development :-)
Thanks :),
Brad and I are both fairly busy this week. Please continue making fixes
and merging them into 'next' for dashboard testing as you are able
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com wrote:
Stephen Kelly wrote:
Yep, I've just had a look and possibily fixed the Intel and HPUX cases.
I did indeed fix the Intel and HPUX cases.
Thank you.
The AIX one fails because the visibility test passes, because
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com wrote:
David Cole wrote:
The test itself passes on AIX, as seen here:
http://www.cdash.org/CDash/testDetails.php?test=109727151build=1460504
It's only the particular machine that you pointed to that has
problems
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Stephen steve...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/24/2011 08:49 PM, David Cole wrote:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Stephen Kellysteve...@gmail.com wrote:
David Cole wrote:
The test itself passes on AIX, as seen here:
http://www.cdash.org/CDash/testDetails.php
Remove C compiler requirement from FindQt4.cmake
CPack/NSIS: Fix reinstall and multiple install issues when using
components.
David Cole (26):
Begin post-2.8.5 development
Fix Architecture test to work with Xcode 4
Fix BuildDepends test to work with Xcode 4
Base
Use this form again, as when you first signed up, to submit your public key:
https://www.kitware.com/Admin/SendPassword.cgi
(You can leave the password field blank, or fill it with irrelevance,
since it's key-based access...)
I'll alert the people on the other end of that form that this
)
Brad King (2):
KWSys: Add hash function for std::string
KWSys: Fix std::string hash function for Borland
Clinton Stimpson (1):
qt4: also find QtUiTools when cross compiling with mingw.
David Cole (3):
Xcode4: Requires more quoting of single quote char
cmake.m4: Use
Merging to next triggers testing on the CMake dashboard clients.
If the maintainer may object to something that shouldn't be in there,
then please contact him first.
You may always merge to 'next' -- but we ask that you use your best
judgment. If something has no chance of being accepted into
Both of those look like reasonable changes (I saw your merges to
'next' today), and they are in just in time for us to consider merging
them in for rc3 and/or the final release of 2.8.6. We'll be in touch
with you if have any questions on them.
Thanks for your efforts,
David
On Mon, Sep 5,
Looks to me like this would be sufficient:
# only build/install the documentation if not crosscompiling
IF(NOT CMAKE_CROSSCOMPILING)
INSTALL_FILES(${CMAKE_MAN_DIR}/man1 FILES ${MAN_FILES})
INSTALL_FILES(${CMAKE_DOC_DIR} FILES ${HTML_FILES} ${TEXT_FILES})
INSTALL(FILES cmake.m4 DESTINATION
The information in this CMake bug tracker issue suggests that this is
*completely* a MinGW / MSYS regression, and not really a cmake
issue...
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=12418
According to the latest note there, just added:
With mingw 4.5.2 it works, but mingw 4.6.1 fails with
Go ahead and push to the stage and merge to next when it's ready.
We're considering several topics for inclusion in the final release.
There's not a lot on the stage right now anyhow. We'll keep it straight. :-)
Thanks,
David
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Eric Noulard
weeks after that.
Would any of you be interested in participating in that discussion via
a t-con? If so, let me know, and I'll arrange for a t-con line and let
you know the dial-in numbers.
Thanks,
David Cole
Kitware, Inc.
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 7:54 AM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
Hello CMake devs,
If you're on the To line, then you have at least one bug assigned to
you in the bug tracker that is slated to be addressed in the CMake
2.8.4 release time frame ( according to
http://public.kitware.com
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Alexander Neundorf neund...@kde.org wrote:
On Tuesday 27 September 2011, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
On Thursday, September 22, 2011 03:00:33 PM Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
On Thursday, September 22, 2011 01:52:51 PM Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
From
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 6:37 AM, Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Currently setting the link dependencies and the link interface involves a
lot of repetition. It is necessary to call target_link_libraries twice:
target_link_libraries(radiobuttonmodel
${QT_QTCORE_LIBRARIES}
I think it would be good to do what you propose, eventually. Emphasis on the
eventually, unless there's a burning need for it on the part of a
contributor.
However, the KWSys files are not directly push-able into our git repository:
we have a server-side hook that rejects pushes containing
Brad and Bill and I will look at this Monday.
We are closing in on the final 2.8.6 release. If we take changes Monday,
we'll merge them, await the dashboard results on Tuesday morning, and then
build the final 2.8.6. If we take no changes, I'll build 2.8.6 on Monday.
You must admit, this fix
Studio 11 generator for x86 and x64 tools
Teach our tests about special cases for VS 11
David Cole (1):
CTestCustom.cmake: Ignore clang's summary warning
Philip Lowman (1):
FindBullet: Also search for _Debug postfixed library names
Raphael Kubo da Costa (1):
Fix typo
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com wrote:
Brad King wrote:
On 10/12/2011 2:22 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
using set(CMAKE_LINK_INTERFACE_LIBRARIES ) should be the same as using
target_link_libraries(libA LINK_INTERFACE_LIBRARIES )
for each library.
It is.
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Richard Wackerbarth rich...@nfsnet.org
wrote:
Steve,
Here is the output from the version of test19 that you sent privately.
The version of cmake was built with last night's dashboard.
Something on the machine went wrong or changed. Same build from
yesterday reports no build problems.
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Rolf Eike Beer e...@sf-mail.de wrote:
Am Dienstag, 18. Oktober 2011, 11:09:39 schrieb Bill Hoffman:
, or a URL linking to its bug tracker page.
I will follow the replies to this thread and add those bugs to the
roadmap as they roll in.
Thanks,
David C.
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 12:19 PM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
Hi all,
*NO* replies requested. Different technique this time. Please
Reminder:
Please make your requests for bug fixes for CMake 2.8.7 by the end of
the day, this Friday, October 28. It will be nice to have as complete
a picture as possible so we can plan the next 6 weeks effectively.
Thanks,
David
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 2:20 PM, David Cole david.c
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com wrote:
On 10/20/2011 5:17 PM, Clinton Stimpson wrote:
For the non working build, we get this in the configure output:
http://www.cdash.org/CDash/buildSummary.php?buildid=1635763
-- Checking whether long long and __int64
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Rolf Eike Beer e...@sf-mail.de wrote:
0010476 No program output if CTest aborts test with timeout
0010941 Code comments for many commands are wrong (copypaste)
0012054 FindJava.cmake too noisy on second run
0010740 STRING(SUBSTRING) should work with length -1
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 5:58 AM, Alexander Neundorf neund...@kde.org wrote:
Hi,
when using out-of-source builds and the Eclipse CDT project generator, a
linked resource is created in the Eclipse project file, which points to
CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR, so the user can browse the source directory.
Now,
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 6:11 AM, Alexander Neundorf neund...@kde.org wrote:
On Sunday 23 October 2011, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
Hi,
I just used ProcessorCount.cmake the first time.
I noticed a small issue:
AFAIK module file names in cmake use CamelCase, while the macros/functions
use
That wiki page says Authorized developers may push directly to the
official repository. But that is not all CMake developers... that is
Brad and I after we review your changes in next, pushed via the topic
stage.
Our workflow all goes through the topic stage. There should be no
reason for you to
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Alexander Neundorf neund...@kde.org wrote:
On Monday 14 November 2011, you wrote:
On 11/14/2011 4:01 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
Instead of adding the code to the bottom of GenerateImportPropertyCode
please create a separate method next to it for that part.
are a contributor, please take note, and get any pending
changes merged to 'next' and tested on the dashboard over the next 2-3
weeks before the first rc.
Thanks,
David Cole
Kitware, Inc.
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource
Thanks.
Applied and pushed to 'next':
http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=20cb5edbcaaf89c35638911c27e6aec1c7fc022f
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Rolf Eike Beer e...@sf-mail.de wrote:
This patch against next (because the offending patch is not in master yet)
fixes one
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com wrote:
On 11/23/2011 12:51 PM, Brad King wrote:
On 11/23/2011 12:48 PM, Brad King wrote:
On 11/23/2011 12:43 PM, Brad King wrote:
On 11/23/2011 12:34 PM, Alexandru Ciobanu wrote:
The regex in question is:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 2:09 PM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com
wrote:
On 11/23/2011 12:51 PM, Brad King wrote:
On 11/23/2011 12:48 PM, Brad King wrote:
On 11/23/2011 12:43 PM, Brad King wrote:
On 11/23/2011
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 3:44 PM, James Bigler jamesbig...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com
wrote:
On 11/29/2011 2:41 PM, Alexandru Ciobanu wrote:
Hi,
We found a workaround that does not require any source code
modifications. I added
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Alexander Neundorf neund...@kde.org wrote:
On Thursday 01 December 2011, Stephen Kelly wrote:
Alexander Neundorf wrote:
Thanks.
diff --git a/tier1/solid/solid/audiointerface.cpp
b/tier1/solid/solid/audiointerface.cpp
index ddf6cbc..98e42b2 100644
---
16, 2011 at 1:31 PM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
Just looking at the calendar...
Three short weeks from today, we are planning to schedule the build
and upload of CMake 2.8.7-rc1 so all of you can give it a try.
Followed by weekly rc's as needed until the final official release
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 7:54 AM, Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com wrote:
Brad King wrote:
On 11/29/2011 7:34 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
I worked on the functionality for per-config target includes, but the
syntax is not right yet.
Please remove per-config support for now.
Do you mean I
1 - 100 of 474 matches
Mail list logo
