Re: [cmake-developers] [CMake 0012301]: CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE not set on MinGW

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 9:06 PM, Clinton Stimpson clin...@elemtech.com wrote: On Jun 22, 2011, at 9:11 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote: On 2011-06-22 17:36-0400 Mantis Bug Tracker wrote: The following issue has been SUBMITTED. ==

[cmake-developers] I'm sure this is often asked

Any reason that environment variables can't be used as cmake variables? Like of course any cmake variable in a script would override the environment, but if it's not otherwise found, checking in the environemnt would make scripts prettier. set BUILD_TYPE=debug set BUILD_MONOLITHIC=1 cmake

Re: [cmake-developers] CMake 2.8.6-rc1 ready for testing!

Thought this came out weeks ago... and I would miss a chance to comment. Watcom support is almost working, the new test version code is... EXECUTE_PROCESS(COMMAND ${CMAKE_TEST_COMPILER} -q -pc \${testWatcomVersionFile}\ OUTPUT_VARIABLE CMAKE_COMPILER_OUTPUT RESULT_VARIABLE

[cmake-developers] visual studio usage

shouldn't cmake use 'msbuild' instead of 'devenv.com' or 'devenv.exe'? I have a feeling that would solve one of my issues with visual studio, in that after building a long chain of cmake projects using visual studio, all of the most recent project references are updated to being the projects that

Re: [cmake-developers] visual studio usage

for generators that prefer one or the other. if( PREFER_MSBUILD ) On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Pau Garcia i Quiles pgqui...@elpauer.org wrote: Hi, It will probably introduce other problems: MsBuild woes http://www.elpauer.org/?p=955 On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 12:49 AM, J Decker d3c

Re: [cmake-developers] visual studio usage

-used file for visual studio, so the things I'm actually working on (not the dozens of projects that get built with automated method) get lost; they get shoved off the list of recently used files pretty quick. On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 9:22 AM, J Decker d3c...@gmail.com wrote: Okay I saw the comments

Re: [cmake-developers] visual studio usage

? The former is slow due to IntelliSense, ReSharper, etc but the latter is very fast. On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 5:59 PM, J Decker d3c...@gmail.com wrote: There are two reasons this is an issue (for me) 1) using devenv to build is MUCH slower on many of the projects than just using MSBuild.  ... yes I

Re: [cmake-developers] visual studio usage

don't really want to build a find_program function for batch files On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Pau Garcia i Quiles pgqui...@elpauer.org wrote: On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Óscar Fuentes o...@wanadoo.es wrote: J Decker d3c...@gmail.com writes: I mean using cmake --build . and/or getting

Re: [cmake-developers] Visual Studio Add Custom Target marked Build

up just building those... and ya, so adding ALL made it a circular dependency list that won't work unless it's a static library(according to vs2010) if I could have the install target marked to be built that would be just as fine. HTH, David On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:02 PM, J Decker d3c

Re: [cmake-developers] Visual Studio Add Custom Target marked Build

Oh, I can have it build INSTALL.vcxproj instead of my_project.sln with target INSTALL. On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 9:17 AM, J Decker d3c...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 9:09 AM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote: You can get install_foo to build always if you include ALL as an arg

[cmake-developers] new Generator

Is tehre anywhere that I can find a howto of how to approach creating a new genreator? -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:

[cmake-developers] Visual studio CLR Support

In the property group for 'configuration' there is a field CLRSupporttrue/CLRSupport which is set and exists if CLR support is enabled. I have set the flags on all of the projects; but I don't know if there's a way to turn this one, and this controls how the project reacts, for instance when

Re: [cmake-developers] new Generator

On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Alexander Neundorf neund...@kde.org wrote: Hi, On Thursday 21 June 2012, J Decker wrote: Is tehre anywhere that I can find a howto of how to approach creating a new genreator? basically, read the sources. For what IDE or build tool would you like

[cmake-developers] help finding where file installs from

I have a file that gets installed with a bunch of other files. Only the file in question is getting installed a couple times. I know where the one is coming from, but I cannot find where the other is. I've updated to using general things like INSTALL( DIRECTORY ... ) so there's no references to

Re: [cmake-developers] help finding where file installs from

Sorry nevermind, there was a file added in the sources. On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 9:20 AM, J Decker d3c...@gmail.com wrote: I have a file that gets installed with a bunch of other files.  Only the file in question is getting installed a couple times.  I know where the one is coming from, but I

Re: [cmake-developers] new Generator

On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 6:55 AM, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com wrote: On 6/21/2012 12:10 PM, J Decker wrote: Is tehre anywhere that I can find a howto of how to approach creating a new genreator? -- What generator are you planning to write? lcc lcc-win32/64 altneratively some

Re: [cmake-developers] new Generator

On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 7:57 AM, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com wrote: On 7/2/2012 10:25 AM, J Decker wrote: lcc lcc-win32/64 Using nmake,jom, gmake or ninja that should not require a new generator. Just a few platform files. See Modules/Platform: ninja looks promising

[cmake-developers] GCC link options

In this commit --no-whole-archive is artificially added to compile options in Modules/Platform/Windows-GNU.cmake. http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commit;h=5f05a3c25e1480648f46c9ccbf775225f9e8e32d This is causes no end of problems for me; because I have code which is indirectly referenced

Re: [cmake-developers] GCC link options

that have been applied to this exectuable target are a bunch more libraries, presumably the ones that are recursively referenced by other libs So how can I add a library to the very end of the list to link? On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 5:35 PM, J Decker d3c...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 2:45

Re: [cmake-developers] GCC link options

Is there a super simple way to get the current build command for say exectuable, string(replace) it, and then execute it in a custom target? On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote: On 07/25/2012 02:12 PM, J Decker wrote: target_link_libraries( playcard --whole

[cmake-developers] flags if target is add_executable( WIN32 )

There's no way to set additional flags to compile if the add_exectuable is WIN32 or console? -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:

[cmake-developers] Cmake and visual studio failing to build....

I'm having a little difficulty figuring out why this is not building my projects using visual studio/msbuild. Basically all I get is == Build: 0 succeeded, 0 failed, 24 up-to-date, 0 skipped == I've used MSBuild with /v:diag set and in the huge log that that generates

Re: [cmake-developers] Cmake and visual studio failing to build....

, Aug 9, 2012 at 4:27 PM, J Decker d3c...@gmail.com wrote: I'm having a little difficulty figuring out why this is not building my projects using visual studio/msbuild. Basically all I get is == Build: 0 succeeded, 0 failed, 24 up-to-date, 0 skipped == I've used MSBuild

[cmake-developers] test for watcom version fails (InstallRequiredSYstemLibraries)

Please make mod to fix (last message has correction) http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=11866#bugnotes I don't have git available at this moment, but it's a one line change... -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at

Re: [cmake-developers] test for watcom version fails (InstallRequiredSYstemLibraries)

Okay figured out the required mods to use the common version variable... http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=11866#c30208 On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 5:23 AM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote: On 08/09/2012 09:00 PM, J Decker wrote: Please make mod to fix (last message has

Re: [cmake-developers] Cmake and visual studio failing to build....

=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=e16f58ddd6aea9bebc6b4a914eed54cf7517ff61 ] ... so it did not go into the 2.8.9 release. Thx, David On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 7:33 PM, J Decker d3c...@gmail.com wrote: After considering this a bit more I went to this C:\GENERAL\BUILD\VS10-X86\ALTANIK\CMAKEFILES directory

Re: [cmake-developers] Cmake and visual studio failing to build....

at 2:35 PM, J Decker d3c...@gmail.com wrote: Ya, unfortunatly I don't have the specific case that was failing anymore... it's probably because I've been using the same build output since 2.8.6 and just keep updating cmake... last couple versions have actually gone smoothly On Fri, Aug 10

[cmake-developers] execute_process inconsitancy

I use this command to get the current repository version number. Under windows I have to use 'cmd /c ...' under linux or I obviously can't use that. Is there a test I can do in a cmakelists to test the shell processor? Is there something I can do to make this the same command? Under windows,

Re: [cmake-developers] execute_process inconsitancy

On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote: On 09/03/2012 03:04 PM, J Decker wrote: I use this command to get the current repository version number. Under windows I have to use 'cmd /c ...' under linux or I obviously can't use that. Is there a test I can do

Re: [cmake-developers] execute_process inconsitancy

...@kitware.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 5:15 PM, J Decker d3c...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote: On 09/03/2012 03:04 PM, J Decker wrote: I use this command to get the current repository version number. Under windows I have to use 'cmd /c

Re: [cmake-developers] execute_process inconsitancy

at 5:48 PM, J Decker d3c...@gmail.com wrote: dir c:\Program Files\tortoisehg Volume in drive C has no label. Volume Serial Number is F05B-C5AF Directory of c:\Program Files\tortoisehg 08/20/2012 10:47 PM33,544 hg.exe I don't know what hy.py would be . On Mon

Re: [cmake-developers] execute_process inconsitancy

I do have a workaround by taking the quotes out of the path... On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 7:23 PM, J Decker d3c...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 3:58 PM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote: OK... Is hg.exe in the PATH? Do you get different results if you use the full path to hg.exe

Re: [cmake-developers] execute_process inconsitancy

On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 7:50 PM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote: That's not a workaround, that's the solution. The quotes don't belong there. I dunno seems to be an application specific failure On Sep 3, 2012, at 10:24 PM, J Decker d3c...@gmail.com wrote: I do have

Re: [cmake-developers] visual studio usage

up basically obliterating the most recently used files with CMAKE_TRY_COMPILE's. On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 3:49 PM, J Decker d3c...@gmail.com wrote: shouldn't cmake use 'msbuild' instead of 'devenv.com' or 'devenv.exe'? I have a feeling that would solve one of my issues with visual studio

[cmake-developers] project file conflict;An ah-hah moment

for a while I've had an occasional issue something like LINK : fatal error LNK1104: cannot open file 'C:\general\build\vs10-x86\sack\debug_solution\video_link\Debug\video_link _server.ilk' [C:\general\build\vs10-x86\sack\debug_solution\video_link\video_link_server.vcxproj] I usually get

Re: [cmake-developers] project file conflict;An ah-hah moment

On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote: On 04/05/2013 12:50 PM, J Decker wrote: # commenting this out also makes it not happen; but should not affect the incremental link file name... SET_TARGET_PROPERTIES( video_link_server.isp PROPERTIES

Re: [cmake-developers] [CMake] Announcing CMake Tools for Visual Studio

Yup; painless to install, works as described :) Thanx On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Klaim - Joël Lamotte mjkl...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 1:04 AM, David Golub golu...@gmail.com wrote: I’m pleased to announce the first release candidate of CMake Tools for Visual Studio,

Re: [cmake-developers] [CMake 0014403]: Add an option to specify Visual Studio solution name

the project name is the (last? first?) project( ${project_name} ) name. On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Mantis Bug Tracker man...@public.kitware.com wrote: The following issue has been SUBMITTED. ==

[cmake-developers] Cmake configure unicode?

Should cmake be able to configure unicode, if the unicode file has appropriate byte order indicators maybe? I know it doesn't... for windows (and a bad test for if windows at that) macro( DO_CONFIGURE_FILE input output ) if( $ENV{COMSPEC} MATCHES cmd ) STRING( REPLACE / \\ s1

Re: [cmake-developers] [CMake 0014694]: Percent symbol (%) in path creates bad autogenerated paths

work around; use #25; which is the xml code for % to escape it; It needs to be encoded on the output to the visual studio XML project/solution On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Mantis Bug Tracker man...@public.kitware.com wrote: The following issue has been SUBMITTED.

Re: [cmake-developers] Order of linking libraries

It's in the same order as it is specified; if the same configuration options are used, it should be the same list always. IF things are somehow installed differently maybe; but the installed libraries should still be located in the same order. It is the same order for all generators. The order of

[cmake-developers] Watcom import library fails if no symbols in the DLL

I was recently communicating with openwatcom matinainers; which just released a version 2.0 fork on sourceforge... but the issue was basically... if I have a shared library with no exports, it fails to build. I used to use a method...(and this is how cmake does it) wlink (...) # build library

Re: [cmake-developers] Cmake contribution for Open Watcom (patch)

That continues to be broken for what we talked about in the newsgroup; The wlib should be removed *???* On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Jiri Malak malak.j...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I would like contribute to CMake for Open Watcom Toolchain. Now only WIN32 host and target is supported. I

Re: [cmake-developers] Cmake contribution for Open Watcom (patch)

THere is 'toolchain' support sort-of in cmake, for selecting targets Something else that cmake building is lacking is a working RC compiler default... SET( CMAKE_RC_COMPILER rc ) # I dunno; something about floating point, not sure if it's required it's from long ago... probably because I

Re: [cmake-developers] [Patch] Remove hard coded version of RTDLL for Open Watcom

and a fix for 'option implib[=...]' as part of the wlink since it's a one step anyway and not a dependant step On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 6:47 PM, Jiri Malak malak.j...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I enclosed next patch for Open Watcom toolchain, which remove hardcoded version number for RTDLL. It is

Re: [cmake-developers] Building executables as libraries

I think this is impractical... the native activituy doesn't provide a hood to call 'main' and while you may have special code to treat main as an export and dynamically load it, actually stubstitute the single program with a loader dll and the program as a DLL, and the loader DLL has custom code

Re: [cmake-developers] [CMake 0014827]: Preprocessor definitions for x64 projects are not correct on Windows Platform.

Personally I liked that win32 was defined still, since that caused the least disruption to existing code. I have additional tests to enable 64bit by testing for cmake_cl_64 then more generically with CMAKE_SIZEOF_VOID_P since the API doesn't really change, it still really looks like a win32

Re: [cmake-developers] Building executables as libraries

I dunno; again, there isn't a magic call to 'main' which sets up the approriate call... there could be, but it would be project specific It would make more sense to make a macro like add_program which would hide the if; and would be an easy conversion from add_executable to add_program

Re: [cmake-developers] Building executables as libraries

and (sorry for double reply) having add_executable always build as a library means I can't build real executables... if it did it based on the WIN32 flag (or equivalent0 it would be better On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 7:17 AM, J Decker d3c...@gmail.com wrote: I dunno; again, there isn't a magic

Re: [cmake-developers] [PATCH] cleanup Watcom Windows configuration

On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 7:47 AM, Jiri Malak malak.j...@gmail.com wrote: I atached patch which cleanup Watcom Windows configuration It includes following changes. remove Watcom linker caseexact options already defined in linker system definition what do you mean 'defined in linker system

Re: [cmake-developers] OpenBSD without SONAME

CMake would much rather use full paths rather than -L/-l because of ambiguity problems. While I can see that; I can get around abguity by ordering the order of -L entries... like if one was buliding an upgrade to an already installed library, one would want the current version to link against

[cmake-developers] Install quiet option

in the vein of http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_Useful_Variables CMAKE_INSTALL_ALWAYS patch adds CMAKE_INSTALL_QUIET This bypasses 'Up-to-date:' on file that are up to date and 'Installing' on directories that already exist and are directories. There are 3 places that call 'ReportCopy' the third

Re: [cmake-developers] Install quiet option

cleaned up patch and investigated what symlink install does; this should work for that too... updated http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=13761#bugnotes On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 2:20 PM, J Decker d3c...@gmail.com wrote: in the vein of http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_Useful_Variables

Re: [cmake-developers] Install quiet option

)); instead of + cmSystemTools::IsOn(cmSystemTools::GetEnv(CMAKE_INSTALL_QUIET)); but GetProperty() always returns NULL? On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 7:41 AM, J Decker d3c...@gmail.com wrote: cleaned up patch and investigated what symlink install does; this should work for that too... updated http

Re: [cmake-developers] Install quiet option

' doesn't appear anywhere in my build directories... crazy. On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:48 AM, J Decker d3c...@gmail.com wrote: Hmmm... environment variable doens't work very cleanly... I have another idea set_property(GLOBAL PROPERTY QUIET_INSTALL ON ) sort of like 'set_property(GLOBAL

[cmake-developers] OpenWatcom wMake and VERBOSE=1

VERBOSE=1 only triggers the first level to be verbose in a make... any subsequent call to wmake passes '-s' option and not VERBOSE=1 continuously... I'm not sure where the '-s' option on wmake is coming from, browsed the code a little... but it'd be kind of nice if this feature worked. --

[cmake-developers] Watcom updates in 3.1 break linking usable code

wlink uses the option 'system nt_dll' if it builds a DLL; if this is not specified, the resulting file generates exceptions. This was moved from ... / modules/platform/windows-wcl386.cmake -- set(CMAKE_CXX_CREATE_SHARED_LIBRARY wlink ${CMAKE_START_TEMP_FILE} ${CMAKE_WLINK_QUIET} name

Re: [cmake-developers] Watcom updates in 3.1 break linking usable code

(WATCOM18 1) endif() if(${_compiler_version} VERSION_EQUAL 1.9) set(WATCOM19 1) endif() if(${_compiler_version} VERSION_EQUAL 2.0) set(WATCOM20 1) endif() endif() endif() On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 4:03 PM, J Decker d3c...@gmail.com wrote: wlink uses the option 'system

[cmake-developers] Revert watcom symfile option

Recently watcom link options were changed to generate .sym files instead of building the debug information into targets. The rules used to create the .sym name for some files are kind of bad, and there is no way to set the symbol file name of a target; so it is better to revert that change. It's

Re: [cmake-developers] CMake 3.1 Android - generator expressions and output names

Set_source_files_properties( *test2.c** PROPERTIES** LANGUAGE CXX** )* http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2008-July/022647.html On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 5:45 AM, Dmitry Polyanitsa dpolyani...@nvidia.com wrote: Yes, that's the one. Nsight Tegra will upgrade the projects without a prompt, but

Re: [cmake-developers] [Review request] Topic install_CMAKE_INSTALL_RELATIVE

On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote: On 12/22/2014 03:28 PM, Domen Vrankar wrote: Maybe others will disagree but to be quite honest I myself don't think that CMAKE_INSTALL_RELATIVE variable would be the right solution... I myself prefer to write install

Re: [cmake-developers] Is there a way to avoid LOCATION property with Qt5?

many places that you would use LOCATION you can use generator expressions http://www.cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.0/manual/cmake-generator-expressions.7.html $TARGET_FILE_DIR:targetname On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 12:30 AM, Alan W. Irwin ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca wrote: Hi Nils: Thanks for your quick

Re: [cmake-developers] C# support?

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote: On 06/26/2015 10:47 AM, Stuermer, Michael SP/HZA-ZSEP wrote: Does it have a realistic chance to be accepted for upstream Yes, so long as it comes with proper tests and is not too intrusive on the overall

Re: [cmake-developers] Antwort: Re: Specifying a VS installation path explicitly

Actually most of the logic is not in the source but in the modules ~/cmake/modules/platform/Windows-MSVC.cmake can also use cmake --trace with maybe a simple cmake file to see what it might use... On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Brad King wrote: > On 10/27/2015 12:50 PM,

Re: [cmake-developers] script mode current directory

On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 4:40 AM, Tamás Kenéz wrote: > In script mode it seems that all the CMAKE_[CURRENT_](BINARY|SOURCE)_DIR > variables are set to the current working directory. > if CMAKE_[CURRENT]_SOURCE_DIR is current directory; you're doing something wrong :) That

Re: [cmake-developers] Get the list of files that will be installed by CMake?

building the list of things to install and then using that list... the other way no. On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Robert Goulet wrote: > Hi all, > > > > Is there a way in CMake to get the list of files that are going to be > installed when we use the install

Re: [cmake-developers] How to set startup project in Visual Studio

ctUser( target ) shouldn't be too painful... On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Stephen Kelly <steve...@gmail.com> wrote: > J Decker wrote: > > > The setting is in a different file that's .vcproj.user (or .user.vcproj) > > And there is not one of these for each project

Re: [cmake-developers] CMake alternative language

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Jean-Michaël Celerier wrote: > The problem is doing : > > list(LENGTH MyList NumList) > math(EXPR MaxItList ${NumList}-1) > > foreach(i RANGE ${MaxItList}) > list(GET MyOtherListOfSameSizeThanMyList ${i} Element)

Re: [cmake-developers] CMake alternative language

My stumbling blocks are the use of keywords instead of operators... if( Something == ${SomeOtherThing} ) vs if( Something STREQUAL ${SomeOtherTHing} ) It might be nice if the operator '=' could be used in addition to the function SET() SET( a something ) becomes A = something Was gong to say

Re: [cmake-developers] How to set startup project in Visual Studio

The setting is in a different file that's .vcproj.user (or .user.vcproj) and cmake doesn't write that... would be nice if it could at least write those entiries required... nice thing about xml should be that what's there can be read and used and filled in with the rest of the settings? Well I

Re: [cmake-developers] GCC x cmake

On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Ivam Pretti wrote: > I would like to know what are the advantages or difference when compared > to GCC compiler. > > I understand from the topic you mean compared to cmake; but the two are two different things gcc is a compiler cmake is a