There is this 9 year old ticket about support for precompiled headers,
http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=1260
And I wanna bring up a patch for discussion,
http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=stage/cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=d207f1bf8fd697ae6521a1336dd27222168f548e
With the two new source file
On 11/26/2013 12:32 PM, Peter Kuemmel wrote:
So, is this the right way to improve the pch situation?
Please summarize the situation here so we don't have to read the
entire history of issue 1260 and all the proposed approaches.
IIUC the modules in issue 1260 are all a workaround for lack for
Peter Kuemmel wrote:
So, is this the right way to improve the pch situation?
I don't know anything about PCH, but Daniel Pfeifer has a branch here:
https://github.com/purpleKarrot/CMake/tree/WIP-PCH-Support
Thanks,
Steve.
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source
On 11/26/2013 12:32 PM, Peter Kuemmel wrote:
So, is this the right way to improve the pch situation?
Please summarize the situation here so we don't have to read the
entire history of issue 1260 and all the proposed approaches.
As you already said, many attempts to solve the problem with
On 11/26/2013 02:23 PM, Peter Kuemmel wrote:
I'm not sure if it is a good idea to implement the pch support
completely on the C++ side
It could be a combination of C++-coded logic plus lookups of
platform information variables set in Modules/Platform/*.cmake
and Modules/Compiler/*.cmake files.
It could be a combination of C++-coded logic plus lookups of
You mean lookups only form C++ the side?
platform information variables set in Modules/Platform/*.cmake
and Modules/Compiler/*.cmake files. Just about everything
CMake generates works this way.
With this property we have
I don't know anything about PCH
So PCHs were never relevant in your real world projects?
I also don't use them very often because of the non-existing
support of CMake. And too often you break the build when
someone builds without using PCHs.
On 11/26/2013 03:20 PM, Peter Kuemmel wrote:
That doesn't matter because IMO the properties are not suitable
for addition because they step on the toes of internal implementation
What properties would be needed for the IDEs?
And couldn't we make some properties internal only?
We can't
2013/11/26 Stephen Kelly steve...@gmail.com:
Peter Kuemmel wrote:
So, is this the right way to improve the pch situation?
I don't know anything about PCH, but Daniel Pfeifer has a branch here:
https://github.com/purpleKarrot/CMake/tree/WIP-PCH-Support
Thanks for pointing at this branch. I
