Re: [cmake-developers] Better QNX QCC handling

2014-01-10 Thread Brad King
On 01/09/2014 06:08 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote: The solution would seem to be to create a new compiler id 'QCC' If the compiler has its own command-line front-end that uses different flags than the currently detected compiler id, then yes a new id makes sense. -Brad -- Powered by www.kitware.com

Re: [cmake-developers] Better QNX QCC handling

2014-01-10 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 1/10/2014 9:12 AM, Brad King wrote: On 01/09/2014 06:08 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote: The solution would seem to be to create a new compiler id 'QCC' If the compiler has its own command-line front-end that uses different flags than the currently detected compiler id, then yes a new id makes

Re: [cmake-developers] Better QNX QCC handling

2014-01-10 Thread Stephen Kelly
Bill Hoffman wrote: On 1/10/2014 9:12 AM, Brad King wrote: On 01/09/2014 06:08 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote: The solution would seem to be to create a new compiler id 'QCC' If the compiler has its own command-line front-end that uses different flags than the currently detected compiler id, then

[cmake-developers] Better QNX QCC handling

2014-01-09 Thread Stephen Kelly
Hi, I have this patch: diff --git a/Modules/Platform/QNX.cmake b/Modules/Platform/QNX.cmake index 8d45360..58ec112 100644 --- a/Modules/Platform/QNX.cmake +++ b/Modules/Platform/QNX.cmake @@ -1,12 +1,10 @@ set(QNXNTO 1) -# Revise -# The QNX GCC does not seem to have -isystem so remove the