Re: [cmake-developers] Faster automoc with parallel processing?

2012-06-19 Thread Thomas Sondergaard
Hi Alexander, Thanks for replying. On 2012-06-18 21:58, Alexander Neundorf wrote: On Sunday 17 June 2012, Thomas Sondergaard wrote: On Windows with MSVC 2010 Generator, moc seems to be very slow and it is a paint to see it run sequentially. Could automoc be taught to do this in

Re: [cmake-developers] Faster automoc with parallel processing?

2012-06-19 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Tuesday 19 June 2012, Thomas Sondergaard wrote: Hi Alexander, Thanks for replying. On 2012-06-18 21:58, Alexander Neundorf wrote: On Sunday 17 June 2012, Thomas Sondergaard wrote: On Windows with MSVC 2010 Generator, moc seems to be very slow and it is a paint to see it run

Re: [cmake-developers] Faster automoc with parallel processing?

2012-06-19 Thread Thomas Sondergaard
On 2012-06-19 22:13, Alexander Neundorf wrote: Considering a 8 or 16 core machine, this could give already 256 mocs running on 16 cores. I think this would then really be a bit much. I'd actually have to check first whether most of the time is spent in executing moc, or in parsing the files for

Re: [cmake-developers] Faster automoc with parallel processing?

2012-06-18 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Sunday 17 June 2012, Thomas Sondergaard wrote: Hi, I've tested the new automoc feature and it certainly makes the developers life simpler and the CMakeLists.txt a lot simpler. Thanks for that, it is a great improvement. On Windows with MSVC 2010 Generator, moc seems to be very slow and

[cmake-developers] Faster automoc with parallel processing?

2012-06-17 Thread Thomas Sondergaard
Hi, I've tested the new automoc feature and it certainly makes the developers life simpler and the CMakeLists.txt a lot simpler. Thanks for that, it is a great improvement. On Windows with MSVC 2010 Generator, moc seems to be very slow and it is a paint to see it run sequentially. Could