Brad King wrote:
On 11/29/2011 8:40 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
Alexander Neundorf wrote:
Nevertheless, personally I would also provide the Qt5Core_LIBRARY
variable, so if somebody wants to have a look what that variable
currently actually is (would by the name if the imported target), he can
On 11/30/2011 9:09 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
Brad King wrote:
Alex was proposing simply to provide the singular name as a variable but not
to cache it. The only reason to cache a variable is when we're searching and
need to let the user help out or override. In a Config.cmake file we know
the
On Wednesday, November 30, 2011 07:33:48 am Stephen Kelly wrote:
Brad King wrote:
On 11/30/2011 9:09 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
Brad King wrote:
Alex was proposing simply to provide the singular name as a variable
but not
to cache it. The only reason to cache a variable is when we're
On Wednesday 30 November 2011, Stephen Kelly wrote:
Brad King wrote:
On 11/30/2011 9:09 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
Brad King wrote:
Alex was proposing simply to provide the singular name as a variable
but not
to cache it. The only reason to cache a variable is when we're
searching and
On Wednesday 30 November 2011, Stephen Kelly wrote:
Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Tuesday 29 November 2011, Stephen Kelly wrote:
Alexander Neundorf wrote:
I can't generate the files. I'm asking people with windows and mac
setups to generate them and post them for review. I don't have
Stephen Kelly wrote:
Brad King wrote:
On 11/30/2011 9:09 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
Brad King wrote:
Alex was proposing simply to provide the singular name as a variable
but not
to cache it. The only reason to cache a variable is when we're
searching and
need to let the user help out or
Alexander Neundorf wrote:
Static builds of Qt are no longer tested by Nokia at least as far as I
know. I don't know if it is even possible to build Qt statically on all
(or any) platforms anymore.
Ah, ok.
So if we (at work) would like to have static builds, we maybe should take
action ?
On 11/29/2011 8:00 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
Alexander Neundorf wrote:
I can't generate the files. I'm asking people with windows and mac setups
to generate them and post them for review. I don't have those setups.
Just the ones for Linux would already help :-)
I managed to get generated
Brad King wrote:
On 11/29/2011 8:00 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
Alexander Neundorf wrote:
I can't generate the files. I'm asking people with windows and mac
setups to generate them and post them for review. I don't have those
setups.
Just the ones for Linux would already help :-)
I managed
Brad King wrote:
On 11/29/2011 10:53 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
Qt5Core_LIBRARY is intended to be the thing that users would use in the
CMakeLists.txt.
I've had another read of the Modules/readme.txt and I guess I need to
change it to be consistent.
So should I rename them or should I
On Tuesday 29 November 2011, Stephen Kelly wrote:
Alexander Neundorf wrote:
I can't generate the files. I'm asking people with windows and mac
setups to generate them and post them for review. I don't have those
setups.
Just the ones for Linux would already help :-)
I managed to get
On Tuesday 29 November 2011, Brad King wrote:
On 11/29/2011 10:53 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
Qt5Core_LIBRARY is intended to be the thing that users would use in the
CMakeLists.txt.
I've had another read of the Modules/readme.txt and I guess I need to
change it to be consistent.
So
Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Tuesday 29 November 2011, Stephen Kelly wrote:
Alexander Neundorf wrote:
I can't generate the files. I'm asking people with windows and mac
setups to generate them and post them for review. I don't have those
setups.
Just the ones for Linux would already
Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Tuesday 29 November 2011, Brad King wrote:
On 11/29/2011 10:53 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
Qt5Core_LIBRARY is intended to be the thing that users would use in the
CMakeLists.txt.
I've had another read of the Modules/readme.txt and I guess I need to
change it
On 11/28/2011 05:51 PM, Brad King wrote:
On 11/25/2011 10:02 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
https://qt.gitorious.org/+kdab-developers/qt/kdab-developers-qtbase/
the branch is cmake_files. The testing steps are:
1) build and install Qt
It doesn't appear to build at all on Windows with VS 9:
On Friday 25 November 2011, Stephen Kelly wrote:
Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Friday 25 November 2011, Stephen Kelly wrote:
Stephen Kelly wrote:
Hi there,
I am working on installing CMake config files from the Qt repository
so that there is less need for a FindQt.cmake.
By
Stephen Kelly wrote:
Hi there,
I am working on installing CMake config files from the Qt repository so
that there is less need for a FindQt.cmake.
By the way, it would be very helpful if anyone tried to build and test this
on windows and mac.
The clone is at
On Friday 25 November 2011, Stephen Kelly wrote:
Stephen Kelly wrote:
Hi there,
I am working on installing CMake config files from the Qt repository so
that there is less need for a FindQt.cmake.
By the way, it would be very helpful if anyone tried to build and test this
on windows
On Thursday 24 November 2011, Stephen Kelly wrote:
Hi there,
I am working on installing CMake config files from the Qt repository so
that there is less need for a FindQt.cmake.
The motivation is that between releases of Qt and CMake, the features of Qt
get out of sync with the features
19 matches
Mail list logo
