Re: [cmake-developers] Need more information concerning the Trilinos test of CMake

2017-10-25 Thread Rolf Eike Beer
> I notice in > there is > an unstage comment from you. Just out of curiosity, does that mean > that commit was effectively immediately removed from > stage/master/head? Yes. Eike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed

Re: [cmake-developers] Need more information concerning the Trilinos test of CMake

2017-10-25 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2017-10-25 07:03-0400 Brad King wrote: On 10/24/2017 05:47 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote: Since I essentially never get CMake build errors when building CMake by hand using the bootstrap method, I assume these build errors are due to some issue with how I set up my_dashboard.cmake. The

Re: [cmake-developers] Need more information concerning the Trilinos test of CMake

2017-10-25 Thread Brad King
On 10/24/2017 05:47 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote: > Since I essentially never get CMake build errors when building > CMake by hand using the bootstrap method, I assume these build > errors are due to some issue with how I set up my_dashboard.cmake. The difference is that the script is testing the

Re: [cmake-developers] Need more information concerning the Trilinos test of CMake

2017-10-25 Thread Brad King
On 10/24/2017 05:10 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote: > It appears cmake_common.cmake only provides the capability of changing > the --parallel option for the bootstrap script. Must I change that > script in order to specify additional bootstrap options I normally use > such as --qt-gui --system-curl or

Re: [cmake-developers] Need more information concerning the Trilinos test of CMake

2017-10-25 Thread Brad King
On 10/25/2017 04:46 AM, Rolf Eike Beer wrote: > This very much looks like a change I had in a few weeks ago but removed > from there because of exactly those compile failures. This is all under discussion here: https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmake/merge_requests/1402 The errors this time

Re: [cmake-developers] Need more information concerning the Trilinos test of CMake

2017-10-25 Thread Rolf Eike Beer
Am 2017-10-25 02:24, schrieb Alan W. Irwin: @Matthias: I am directly addressing you in this post because git bisect says your recent commit is the first one that shows this issue. More details below. commit 49287eed2bf9860919a155af848e7cf49d45f504 Author: Matthias Maennich

Re: [cmake-developers] Need more information concerning the Trilinos test of CMake

2017-10-24 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2017-10-24 17:24-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote: Note the rest of the results at appear to have no build errors like the ones demonstrated on my (Debian Jessie) system which is why I mentioned my g++ version above. Oops. I forgot to include that

Re: [cmake-developers] Need more information concerning the Trilinos test of CMake

2017-10-24 Thread Alan W. Irwin
@Matthias: I am directly addressing you in this post because git bisect says your recent commit is the first one that shows this issue. More details below. On 2017-10-24 14:47-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote: Hi Brad: While waiting for your reply to my question concerning how to specify bootstrap

Re: [cmake-developers] Need more information concerning the Trilinos test of CMake

2017-10-24 Thread Alan W. Irwin
Hi Brad: While waiting for your reply to my question concerning how to specify bootstrap script options, I decided to not specify those additional options for my initial try. I submitted that (Experimental) test by hand using ctest -S -V >& ctest.out1. The result (which was a build error) is

Re: [cmake-developers] Need more information concerning the Trilinos test of CMake

2017-10-24 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2017-10-13 14:58-0400 Brad King wrote: On 10/13/2017 12:08 AM, Alan W. Irwin wrote: Accordingly Bill Hoffman suggested to me off-list some time ago that I configure a CMake dashboard submission that builds the master HEAD CMake version and tests it with a build and test of PLplot similarly

Re: [cmake-developers] Need more information concerning the Trilinos test of CMake

2017-10-13 Thread Brad King
On 10/13/2017 12:08 AM, Alan W. Irwin wrote: > Accordingly Bill Hoffman suggested to me off-list > some time ago that I configure a CMake dashboard submission that > builds the master HEAD CMake version and tests it with a build and > test of PLplot similarly to what is done for Trilinos. > >

[cmake-developers] Need more information concerning the Trilinos test of CMake

2017-10-12 Thread Alan W. Irwin
A PLplot configure, build, and test is an excellent indirect test of modern CMake because PLplot currently uses cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.6.2 FATAL_ERROR) and has a relatively small and fast build but with a rather complex build system for its size that has been developed over the