Stephen Kelly wrote:
It can probably be refactored to bypass the genex evaluation though.
The refactoring I described can be done in the future I think, but doesn't
really solve the bug anyway, because it is evaluation of the generator
expression for the target itself which is causing
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=14119
==
Reported By:Shimon Doodkin
Assigned To:
I created a topic called WindowsFormsResx following the developer
guide instructions and have committed my staged changes and a test
project. I don't know how to send out a link to this, but would be
happy to do so if someone pointed me in the right direction.
- John
On 2013-04-28 20:46,
On 04/29/2013 06:29 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
I've force-pushed the fix-multi-config-tll-include-dirs branch with a more-
simple fix for this issue to my clone.
Okay, that looks good. Please rebase on the partial fix I merged last
week so we can test it in 'next'. I'll squash all that together
Hi John,
Seems your topic isn't available on the CMake stage:
http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=stage/cmake.git
I would suggest you push your topic on github instead. The stage is used by
module maintainer or CMake core developers [1]
Hth
Jc
[1]
Done and Pull Request sent. Visual Studio C++ Windows Forms Designer
Support
Thanks. I look forward to helping this get into the CMake baseline!
- John
On 2013-04-29 08:08, Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin wrote:
Hi John,
Seems your topic isn't available on the CMake
stage:
On Sunday 28 April 2013, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
One question I see increasingly often is how do I test for C++11 support
or for specific parts of that. For 2.8.12 I plan to include the check
module I wrote for that a while back, and that I have reworked in the last
weeks. You can find the
On Thursday 18 April 2013, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
Hi,
attached are two patches for ctest and cdash from Volkan (on CC).
They are not ready for inclusion, but before we continue to work in this,
we'd like to get some comments whether this is a good idea, the right
approach, etc.
So, here
Hi,
in automoc, for every target foo a foo_automoc target is created, and for each
of those a file foo_automoc.cpp is created.
When this file does not exist, automoc reruns and all moc files should be
regenerated.
To achieve this, I added this file in cmQtAutomoc.cxx to the
On 04/29/2013 03:05 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
Now after some emails on the cmake list, it seems ADDITIONAL_MAKE_CLEAN_FILES
is used only by the Makefile-generators, but not by e.g. the VS generators ?
VS does its own cleaning of the build outputs it knows.
The target is created using
Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Sunday 28 April 2013, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
One question I see increasingly often is how do I test for C++11 support
or for specific parts of that. For 2.8.12 I plan to include the check
module I wrote for that a while back, and that I have reworked in the last
On Monday 29 April 2013, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Sunday 28 April 2013, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
One question I see increasingly often is how do I test for C++11
support or for specific parts of that. For 2.8.12 I plan to include
the check module I wrote for that
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=14121
==
Reported By:Nils Gladitz
Assigned To:
On Monday 29 April 2013, Brad King wrote:
On 04/29/2013 03:05 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
Now after some emails on the cmake list, it seems
ADDITIONAL_MAKE_CLEAN_FILES is used only by the Makefile-generators, but
not by e.g. the VS generators ?
VS does its own cleaning of the build
14 matches
Mail list logo
