[cmake-developers] daemon-mode meeting last Tuesday

2016-06-23 Thread Tobias Hunger
Hello CMake Developers, Stephen Kelly and me met last Tuesday to talk about the daemon-mode patch we both have been working on. It was a very productive meeting: We managed to resolve almost all the differences of opinion we had. Here is a short summary of what we talked about: 0) General   *

Re: [cmake-developers] handling components in Find****

2016-06-23 Thread Brad King
On 06/22/2016 08:11 AM, Farbos a wrote: > I am trying to write a Find module with components and I am not sure > of how it should be written. > I attached the find module, Could someone tell me if I did it well? It looks okay to me from a quick glance. Side note: For variables private to the

Re: [cmake-developers] patch for FindProtobuf.cmake

2016-06-23 Thread Brad King
On 06/22/2016 08:08 PM, Miroslav Drahos wrote: > I believe I found a bug in FindProtobuf.cmake. Using set with two > parameters will insert an unwanted semicolon, the list separator. > The changes I made are like this (several occurrences): > > -set(_protobuf_include_path -I

[cmake-developers] [PATCH] Update documentation for VERSION and SOVERSION for Mach-O file formats (OSX, iOS, BSD etc.)

2016-06-23 Thread Bartosz Kosiorek
Hello. Last time I faced problem, how to set "current version" and "compatibility version" on binaries produced by OS X. I have updated documentation to describe how to archieve that, to make life easier for new CMake users. Please let me know what do you think about it. Do you think it could

Re: [cmake-developers] [PATCH] Update documentation for VERSION and SOVERSION for Mach-O file formats (OSX, iOS, BSD etc.)

2016-06-23 Thread Brad King
On 06/23/2016 11:50 AM, Bartosz Kosiorek wrote: > how to set "current version" and "compatibility version" on > binaries produced by OS X. > I have updated documentation to describe how to archieve that Thanks. I revised the changes a bit and applied the patch: Help: Describe VERSION and

Re: [cmake-developers] daemon-mode meeting last Tuesday

2016-06-23 Thread Brad King
On 06/23/2016 08:27 AM, Tobias Hunger wrote: > Stephen Kelly and me met last Tuesday to talk about the daemon-mode patch we > both have been working on. It was a very productive meeting: We managed to > resolve almost all the differences of opinion we had. Great! Thanks for the detailed summary

Re: [cmake-developers] daemon-mode meeting last Tuesday

2016-06-23 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 16:46:48 -0400, Brad King wrote: > On 06/23/2016 08:27 AM, Tobias Hunger wrote: > > * Figure out whether a PDB file is actually going to be build. Currently > > the PDB file is added to the list of artifacts whenever there is a .lib > > file, which is probably

Re: [cmake-developers] daemon-mode meeting last Tuesday

2016-06-23 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 16:46:48 -0400, Brad King wrote: > On 06/23/2016 08:27 AM, Tobias Hunger wrote: > > * Some names could be improved. Suggestions welcome. > > We'll cover these in more detail during review. The most important name is > the name of the feature, and IMO "daemon" is not an

Re: [cmake-developers] daemon-mode: Infrastructure

2016-06-23 Thread Ben Boeckel
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 02:00:14 +0200, Tobias Hunger wrote: > Implementing new Protocol Versions: > == > Deprecating old Protocol Versions: > One idea that came up on a previous project was the following: namespace protocol {

Re: [cmake-developers] daemon-mode meeting last Tuesday

2016-06-23 Thread Rolf Eike Beer
> 1.1 Communication: > > * Clients should talk to daemon mode via a socket (libuv supports that), > but we also want to support stdin/stdout at least for a "debug mode" * > There should be a separate command line switch to start stdin/out mode and > for socket mode > * This is needed

Re: [cmake-developers] daemon-mode meeting last Tuesday

2016-06-23 Thread Tobias Hunger
Am 23.06.2016 22:46 schrieb "Brad King" : > > On 06/23/2016 08:27 AM, Tobias Hunger wrote: > Great! Thanks for the detailed summary of the meeting and status of the design. You are welcome. > > * Some names could be improved. Suggestions welcome. > > We'll cover these

Re: [cmake-developers] daemon-mode meeting last Tuesday

2016-06-23 Thread Tobias Hunger
Hi Rolf, Am 23.06.2016 23:00 schrieb "Rolf Eike Beer" : > What about just passing --server-fd= into it? That way the client can set > up whatever if wants to pass there and CMake has nothing to do with any setup. > And if one really wants to get messy one could pass a tty there.

Re: [cmake-developers] daemon-mode meeting last Tuesday

2016-06-23 Thread Tobias Hunger
Hi Ben, Am 23.06.2016 22:48 schrieb "Ben Boeckel" : > cmake-oracle sounds reasonable for what it's doing to me. I hope this thing will provide information more reliable than e.g. the Oracle of Delphi in ancient Greece:-) Best Regards, Tobias -- Powered by