>
> This is what Spack and other meta builders do. I don't think CMake is the
> best place to do it, for a number of reasons. I would not try to re-invent
> the wheel here.
>
See http://github. com/llnl/spack
>
-- Elizabeth
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and
ke it will work
> out.
>
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Elizabeth A. Fischer
> <elizabeth.fisc...@columbia.edu> wrote:
> > This is what Spack and other meta builders do. See http://github.
> > com/llnl/spack
> >
> > On Aug 12, 2016 3:59 PM, "Rober
CMake builds for existing libraries are certainly an interesting and useful
thing, and deserve to be posted in a GitHub repo somewhere. They should
also serve as the basis of a campaign to get the library authors to
incorporate the CMake build directly in their repos.
But any approach that
