On 10/25/2011 5:11 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Tuesday 25 October 2011, Stephen Kelly wrote:
...
I think I read somewhere that next gets re-branched from master
periodically. How often does that happen?
Usually every Tuesday.
The Tuesday meetings are when we consider merging topics
Brad King wrote:
On 10/19/2011 11:14 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
On 10/19/2011 6:04 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
I saw that the weekly merge of branches into master happened yesterday,
but the cmake-link-interface-libraries branch didn't make the cut.
[snip]
Not a major rush anyway. I'm still
On 10/25/2011 06:09 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
I've just merged the target-link-libraries-interfaces branch into next, so I
can maybe add tests for that feature whenever the test-target_link_libraries
is more ready.
Sounds good.
What work needs to be done for test-target_link_libraries to
Brad King wrote:
What does CMake think about rebasing? I much prefer to squash a branch
like test-target_link_libraries into fewer commits so that eg adding
newlines and changing tests to examine dashboard changes are not separate
commits. I don't think those commits add value, but only
On Tuesday 25 October 2011, Stephen Kelly wrote:
...
I think I read somewhere that next gets re-branched from master
periodically. How often does that happen?
Usually every Tuesday.
Alex
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
On 10/19/2011 11:14 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
On 10/19/2011 6:04 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
I saw that the weekly merge of branches into master happened yesterday,
but the cmake-link-interface-libraries branch didn't make the cut.
[snip]
Not a major rush anyway. I'm still trying to get used to
Brad King wrote:
On 10/19/2011 6:04 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
I saw that the weekly merge of branches into master happened yesterday,
but the cmake-link-interface-libraries branch didn't make the cut.
Thanks for your work on this.
So I'd like to know:
1) What made it not get merged?
