On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 11:36:24 +0100, Eric Noulard wrote:
> > My personal tendency is to use lower case for local variables and upper
> > case for global variables. May be we can normalize variables to upper case
> > regarding global variables used by CMake itself (which is globally the
> >
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 06:11:26 -0500, David Cole via cmake-developers wrote:
> I would just like to point out that some modules (ExternalData,
> ExternalProject, to name two specific examples) adopted the convention
> to prefix all their provided function names with the module name and
> an
I would just like to point out that some modules (ExternalData,
ExternalProject, to name two specific examples) adopted the convention
to prefix all their provided function names with the module name and
an underscore: for example, ExternalProject_Add and
ExternalData_Expand_Arguments.
These
Le mar. 13 nov. 2018 à 10:41, Marc CHEVRIER a
écrit :
> I agree as well that trying to distinguish macros from functions is not a
> good idea because functions can act in the same way as macros (i.e.
> changing calling environment) but with a better control over environment
> changes (changes
Le mar. 13 nov. 2018 à 00:21, Craig Scott a
écrit :
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 9:51 AM Joachim Wuttke
> wrote:
>
>> My understanding was that prevalent usage in modern CMake
>> is all lowercase for function names, all uppercase for
>> macro names. In this sense, I submitted a number of merge
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 9:51 AM Joachim Wuttke
wrote:
> My understanding was that prevalent usage in modern CMake
> is all lowercase for function names, all uppercase for
> macro names. In this sense, I submitted a number of merge
> requests where function and macro names are normalized, and
>