I ended up using this exact approach with addition of one top level
Makefile which is used to run cmake in build folder. Top level Makefile
takes those arguments and passes them down to the cmake execution, which
than makes a decision on which way to go depending on the argument passed
in.
Here
Hello
I am calling find_library in a loop, using the same variable for HINTS. This
variable (lib_dirs) is set using a script, and when I simply print it using
message(), I obtain this output:
message(${lib_dirs})
On 05.04.2016 23:31, Salazar De Troya, Miguel wrote:
with no line break, whereas the output variable lib_dirs:
message(${lib_dirs})
My apologies, the previous error was because of a trailing whitespace. Although
I would still like to know why the terminal variable
I resolved this using the option OUTPUT_STRIP_TRAILING_WHITESPACE in
execute_process().
https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.0/command/execute_process.html I had not seen
it.
From: Miguel Salazar >
Date: Tuesday, April 5, 2016 at 2:31 PM
To:
Sorry for the spam, but I found out that there is a line break added by CMake
execute_process(COMMAND bash "../grab_libraries.sh" "lib_dirs" "${METHOD}"
OUTPUT_VARIABLE lib_dirs)
grab_libraries.sh is located in the same folder than CMakeLists.txt and I call
cmake .. from a build folder
All,
I am currently working on a very large project that contains over 500
(yes, really) listfiles. A co-worker was looking into some performance
issues we were seeing during configuration and found something very
interesting. Currently configuration is taking 1m57s across several
configurations
Dear All,
I'm stumped on the following, seemingly simple issue.
I need to figure out in my configuration whether a given header file will be
available when I'll try to build my library, or not. So that I could set a
particular definition for the compiler according to whether the file is
Hi Fedja,
As far as I know, the Makefiles generated from CMake cannot contain decisions.
CMake supports several output types aside from Makefiles and some of them
probably don’t support decisions. However, you could supply these arguments
within CMake call using -D option. For example
On 04/05/2016 04:48 AM, melven.roehrig-zoell...@dlr.de wrote:
> Requested changes from Ben Boeckel,
> also adjusted the similar if("${...}" MATCHES ...) statements in the section
> above.
Thanks. Applied:
CMakeDetermineFortranCompiler: Modernize conventions
On 03/31/2016 12:47 PM, Ruslan Baratov wrote:
> What about 3 properties containing list of 's (groups
> unexpanded):
>
> * COMPILE_WARNINGS_DISABLE # e.g. "shift-sign-overflow;unused"
> * COMPILE_WARNINGS_ENABLE # e.g. "ALL"
> * COMPILE_WARNINGS_TREAT_AS_ERROR # e.g. group + specific:
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, master has been updated
via 25a38ecfe7beffe2a2adf522414288810cdc1006 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, master has been updated
via b66a2472321d3a261961de75d9613a5a1ecefb37 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, next has been updated
via 576f741379fcd9201791204619ad01d13c908903 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, next has been updated
via 42c8dec332620edce95b558c57173ad1c04fb340 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, next has been updated
via dd6882100ef94002e69e767aeb1dee6bb5c837a3 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, master has been updated
via fd40b0f875db35b9eaf214fd1013277d1801d589 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, master has been updated
via adea45e15abf95b53e13ea8564cad9fc8e35ed56 (commit)
via
On 04/04/2016 04:08 PM, Adam Treat via cmake-developers wrote:
> I have been working on improving the cmake language module for C# found here:
Thanks for working on this. I'm adding Michael Stuermer to Cc who has
been working on support in the VS IDE generators:
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, next has been updated
via 0b329baad63a5f4639ce96e12dbf8e73484d74dd (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, master has been updated
via 73efdd46555b3236ade1f4431eb9653166b5c97f (commit)
via
On 04/03/2016 05:21 PM, melven.roehrig-zoell...@dlr.de wrote:
> Updated patch for a problem with find_package(BLAS/LAPACK)
> on Windows for pure Fortran projects.
> Now simply uses CMAKE__COMPILER_LOADED...
Thanks! Applied:
Find{BLAS,LAPACK}: Fix when used in pure Fortran projects (#16039)
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, next has been updated
via 5ddcbbbcb8d99efd9b9a43e6b20654af4a791c12 (commit)
via
On 05-Apr-16 21:03, Brad King wrote:
On 03/31/2016 12:47 PM, Ruslan Baratov wrote:
What about 3 properties containing list of 's (groups
unexpanded):
* COMPILE_WARNINGS_DISABLE # e.g. "shift-sign-overflow;unused"
* COMPILE_WARNINGS_ENABLE # e.g. "ALL"
* COMPILE_WARNINGS_TREAT_AS_ERROR # e.g.
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
https://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=16049
==
Reported By:Vidar Meland Ødegård
Assigned To:
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, next has been updated
via 70ae13e6720ca49711c2afa36fcc7e036bd91432 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, next has been updated
via 1fb6c135300184b2c8ea3e8f0785a7aa13334167 (commit)
via
_VERSION_MINOR 5)
-set(CMake_VERSION_PATCH 20160405)
+set(CMake_VERSION_PATCH 20160406)
#set(CMake_VERSION_RC 1)
---
Summary of changes:
Source/CMakeVersion.cmake |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
hooks/
Requested changes from Ben Boeckel,
also adjusted the similar if("${...}" MATCHES ...) statements in the section
above.
Regards
Melven
--
Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. (DLR)
German Aerospace Center
Simulation and Software Technology | Linder Hoehe |
Just checked the size that we are getting, it's 20 Mb for all Makefile and
*.make combined, and 84 mb build.ninja
From: Nils Gladitz [mailto:nilsglad...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 4, 2016 18:57
To: Dmitry Ivanov ; cmake-developers@cmake.org
Subject: Re:
>Teaching the Ninja generator about response files for object file compilation
>would be the way to go (and support for RC as well would be good since the
>logic is likely the same).
I will time box it and see if I can do it in few days, if not we need to figure
out if it can be done like a
31 matches
Mail list logo