Re: [CM] clm delay offset for tap?

2016-09-28 Thread Kjetil Matheussen
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 4:01 PM, wrote: > (int)-1 % (unsigned int)10=> 5 >> > > That's very interesting -- I never noticed this! > Thanks very much for the bugfix -- I'll merge it into > my sources today -- then I need to look at all > the other % cases. > > Yes,

Re: [CM] clm delay offset for tap?

2016-09-28 Thread bil
(int)-1 % (unsigned int)10=> 5 That's very interesting -- I never noticed this! Thanks very much for the bugfix -- I'll merge it into my sources today -- then I need to look at all the other % cases. ___ Cmdist mailing list

Re: [CM] clm delay offset for tap?

2016-09-28 Thread Tito Latini
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:45:11AM +0200, ander...@notam02.no wrote: > Hi Bill, others. > > I'm confused about (positive) offset argument to tap. > > Negative offsets yields perhaps expected results, but positive offsets > starts pulling values from what seems an odd offset into the line. > >

[CM] clm delay offset for tap?

2016-09-28 Thread andersvi
Hi Bill, others. I'm confused about (positive) offset argument to tap. Negative offsets yields perhaps expected results, but positive offsets starts pulling values from what seems an odd offset into the line. (set! (*s7* 'print-length) 20) (define d1 (make-delay 10)) (do ((i 0 (+ 1 i)))