On Monday, 09/14/2020 at 10:07 GMT, "Stanislawski, Shawn (National VM
Capability)" wrote:
> For RECFM V when new record is longer and it would be preferable to
avoid
> truncation, then there does not appear to be a "pretty" solution short
of
> re-platforming (e.g. "go use SFS", etc).
I actuall
>> Would you mind to mark the original as "deleted" and append the
>> longer record to the RECFM V file maybe? But I guess you were going
>> index by record number rather than a key.
Indeed, indexing by record.
So when the file is sitting on a CMS minidisk, it sounds like we have decent
solutions
