On Fri, 17 Sep 2021 at 20:41, John P. Hartmann wrote:
>
>
> My suggestion, Dave, is that you go through the contents of PIPSYSF and
> then tell IBM which function you really want integrated and supported.
That’s my suggestion as well. There’s things in the pipeline to do the
entire lot of
Presuming I am part of the group:
The reason that what is now PIPSYSF did not get rolled into the various
levels of CMS/TSO pipelines is that the remaining function is not always
working as you want. Or perhaps is (ghasp) buggy.
Do you really want IBM to spend the effort to document
I would like to judge the group's opinion on the idea of asking IBM to
roll the PIPSYSF functionality into the base CMS Pipelines package
included in z/VM 7.x. Good idea or not?
Thanks.
DJ
--
BEST REGARDS
DAVE JONES
Managing Director for zSystems Support, zLinux, and Cloud
++1
