Re: [CMS-PIPELINES] Question about starsys *vmevent handling......

2021-04-15 Thread Michael Harding
I think Rob hit the nail on the head. STARSYS tries a 2-way IUCV connection but *VMEVENT is 1-way. You should be using STARMSG instead as it's also 1-way. -- Mike Harding z/VM System Support mhard...@us.ibm.com mikehard...@mindless.com (925) 672-4403 (o) (925) 323-2070 (m) (925) 672-3922 (h) /sp

Re: [CMS-PIPELINES] Question about starsys *vmevent handling......

2021-04-15 Thread Rob van der Heij
On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 at 16:32, Rob van der Heij wrote: > On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 at 16:16, John P. Hartmann wrote: > >> Please trace IUCV to see the interrupt parameter and message number. >> > > I see it as well, and I'm trying to remember what I'm doing wrong, since > folks are using CMS Pipelines

Re: [CMS-PIPELINES] Question about starsys *vmevent handling......

2021-04-15 Thread Rob van der Heij
On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 at 16:16, John P. Hartmann wrote: > Please trace IUCV to see the interrupt parameter and message number. > I see it as well, and I'm trying to remember what I'm doing wrong, since folks are using CMS Pipelines to catch VMEVENT stuff... Rob

Re: [CMS-PIPELINES] Question about starsys *vmevent handling......

2021-04-15 Thread John P. Hartmann
Please trace IUCV to see the interrupt parameter and message number. Also check for message in parameter list. The target class is supposed to identify the data; without that, STARMSG *VMEVENT is useless. Perhaps STARMSG could/should be enhanced to write the IPARML in front of the data (or

[CMS-PIPELINES] Question about starsys *vmevent handling......

2021-04-15 Thread Dave Jones
Hello, gang. I'm trying to use the starsys *VMEVENT stage to capture logon/logoff messages in a z/VM user id. The user id has this in it's definition. priv classes: ABCDG IUCV statement: IUCV *VMEVENT MSGLIMIT 65535 but when I run this simple text case, I see this: pipe starsys *vmevent | cons