[cmucl-help] Re: cmucl-19e + gcc43 better, almost there

[Rex Dieter]

Raymond Toy (RT/EUS) wrote:

on recent kernel-headers.  In short, translating -I- to use -iquote 
instead (and have the build respect our rpm optflags)


Can you describe why you want or need those other optflags?  (I'm not 
familiar with them.)


The latter part about using rpm optflags almost certainly is not of
interest for upstream inclusion.  The switch away from -I- *is*.

Using rpm optflags is mostly for distro consistency, and for us/fedora
anyway, ensures a higher level of distro-wide security, including:
-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 and -fstack-protector

-- Rex

[cmucl-help] Re: cmucl-19e + gcc43 better, almost there

[Raymond Toy (RT/EUS)]

Rex Dieter wrote:

Anyone else trying cmucl-19e on a gcc43-based system?  Any tips, tricks?


Hey, your mail finally made it! :-)

on recent kernel-headers.  In short, translating -I- to use -iquote 
instead (and have the build respect our rpm optflags)


Can you describe why you want or need those other optflags?  (I'm not 
familiar with them.)


Ray