Dumb question on my part as I never had a Racor type filter previously installed on my boat.

500FG has no priming pump that I can see on the pictures.    I suppose this is because one can just pour fuel from top after removing the top cover?

My engine is 2GM20 and from the flow rate perspective this filter is an overkill.     I was initially going to install Racor 120 but wanted 230R10 for reason of having the priming pump.

Thanks

Nick

On 2021-10-17 9:01 a.m., Paul Fountain via CnC-List wrote:

We put a Racor 500 on Perception, located under the sink for easy access, replaces a spin on which was nothing but issues changing the filters and priming. We had a lot of ‘stuff’ in the diesel fuel when we bought Perception, and went thru a lot of filters in the early days.

*/Paul Fountain/*

*/Perception II/*

/1985 C&C 33-II k/cb/

/Port Credit Yacht Club/

*From:*Dave S via CnC-List <cnc-list@cnc-list.com>
*Sent:* October 17, 2021 7:47 AM
*To:* Stus-List <cnc-list@cnc-list.com>
*Cc:* Dave S <syerd...@gmail.com>
*Subject:* Stus-List Re: Racer diesel filter assemblies

Missing some info in my choice below - I agree with Andy’s comments about the shortcomings of the spin-on types which are known to be a PITA, however my installation location could not tidily accommodate a larger filter - also it’s worth checking not only the height of the filter but the required clearances above and below.

Dave - 33-2

Sent from my iPhone



    On Oct 16, 2021, at 8:38 PM, Dave S via CnC-List
    <cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:

    After wading through the various models and -to me at least-
    someway confusing product info, recently purchased a new
    Racor 215R30 as a primary filter for my Yanmar 2GM.  I have not
    installed it yet.  Check industrial channels for this as I
    purchased mine for about 2/3 the price of an identical unit
    through marine channels.  This unit is oversized for our little
    engines and though it seemed large at first it will install neatly
    in windstar.  (33-2). The model I chose has a glass bowl and
    integral priming pump.

    Dave

    Sent from my iPhone



        On Oct 16, 2021, at 4:44 PM, David Knecht via CnC-List
        <cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:

        I am considering replacing my old Racor primary filter
        assembly (currently 30 µm filter) with one of the newer ones,
        but I am unsure what the difference is between them and hoping
        someone can clarify differences I might not recognize.  I was
        initially looking at the 500 series turbine units which start
        around $200.  But there are also 120 series spin on units that
        are less than $100 and seem like they should work:

        
https://www.defender.com/product.jsp?path=-1|311|2349059|2837510&id=133972#
        
<https://www.defender.com/product.jsp?path=-1%7C311%7C2349059%7C2837510&id=133972>

        Does anyone know if there is a reason not to use the less
        expensive models?  I plan to also add a remote vacuum gauge at
        the helm station if that matters.  Thanks- Dave

        S/V Aries

        1990 C&C 34+

        New London, CT



        Thanks to all of the subscribers that contributed to the list
        to help with the costs involved.  If you want to show your
        support to the list - use PayPal to send contribution --
        https://www.paypal.me/stumurray  Thanks - Stu

    Thanks to all of the subscribers that contributed to the list to
    help with the costs involved.  If you want to show your support to
    the list - use PayPal to send contribution --
    https://www.paypal.me/stumurray  Thanks - Stu


Thanks to all of the subscribers that contributed to the list to help with the 
costs involved.  If you want to show your support to the list - use PayPal to 
send contribution --https://www.paypal.me/stumurray   Thanks - Stu
Thanks to all of the subscribers that contributed to the list to help with the 
costs involved.  If you want to show your support to the list - use PayPal to 
send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray  Thanks - Stu

Reply via email to