] On
Behalf Of Russ Melody
Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2012 1:22 PM
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Subject: Re: Stus-List Mast rake adjustment
Yeah, as Rich says.
And next year let's do a mast replacement on her. Say, a carbonF double
spreader, 7/8, C/Ps moved inboard.
Sized to current jibs so PHRF
: Stus-List Mast rake adjustment
Dwight,
I is the deck to masthead measurement, i.e. the vertical side of the
triangle. The forestay is the hypotenuse.
I'm trying to return the rig configuration to where it was before the
adjustments I made. I did have 10 inches at the gooseneck. Now
: Saturday, September 8, 2012 8:56:01 AM
Subject: Re: Stus-List Mast rake adjustment
Dennis,
Instead of lengthening the forestay, can you move the butt of the mast forward
any? I think a ½” of movement at the base of the mast should give you at least
5” at the masthead.
Jake
.
From: Chuck S cscheaf...@comcast.net
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Sent: Saturday, September 8, 2012 8:21 AM
Subject: Re: Stus-List Mast rake adjustment
Hi Dennis,
Before ordering the new headstay, I would experiment by adding a toggle to the
bottom of the headstay. A toggle at the top
-list.com
Sent: Saturday, September 8, 2012 7:54 AM
Subject: Re: Stus-List Mast rake adjustment
Sounds about right to me, Dennis, except you really don't have a right
triangle so the math will be slightly skewed. You might do better by drawing
it up to scale and measuring the forestay. Why a new
, September 07, 2012 6:14 PM
To: Cn Clist
Subject: Stus-List Mast rake adjustment
OK, check my math and thinking on this one.
I want to increase the rake in Touche's mast. I made some changes in the rig a
few months ago which brought the masthead forward so the plumb from the
masthead is only
, September 07, 2012 6:14 PM
To: Cn Clist
Subject: Stus-List Mast rake adjustment
OK, check my math and thinking on this one.
I want to increase the rake in Touche's mast. I made some changes in the rig
a few months ago which brought the masthead forward so the plumb from the
masthead is only about
From: cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On
Behalf Of Dennis C.
Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2012 10:21 AM
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Subject: Re: Stus-List Mast rake adjustment
Jake,
Let's just say I'm being creative with the foretriangle to take
this right.
This is really an example of extreme rig tweaking.
Dennis C.
From: Chuck S cscheaf...@comcast.net
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Sent: Saturday, September 8, 2012 8:21 AM
Subject: Re: Stus-List Mast rake adjustment
Hi Dennis,
Before ordering the new headstay, I would experiment by adding
: Saturday, September 8, 2012 8:21 AM
Subject: Re: Stus-List Mast rake adjustment
Hi Dennis,
Before ordering the new headstay, I would
experiment by adding a toggle to the bottom of
the headstay. A toggle at the top sounds like
someone reheaded the rod and made it too
short? Is there a toggle
]
On Behalf Of Dennis C.
Sent: September 7, 2012 7:14 PM
To: Cn Clist
Subject: Stus-List Mast rake adjustment
OK, check my math and thinking on this one.
I want to increase the rake in Touche's mast. I made some changes in the
rig a few months ago which brought the masthead forward so
: cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com]
On Behalf Of dwight veinot
Sent: September 7, 2012 7:57 PM
To: 'Dennis C.'; cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Subject: Re: Stus-List Mast rake adjustment
Dennis
I believe for your 35-1 I=44 is the hypotenuse.you need the perpendicular
to the story.
Dennis C.
From: dwight veinot dwightvei...@hfx.eastlink.ca
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Sent: Friday, September 7, 2012 7:07 PM
Subject: Re: Stus-List Mast rake adjustment
Sorry Dennis, on reading again now I see
what you are doing…got confused
-list.com
Sent: Friday, September 7, 2012 7:07 PM
Subject: Re: Stus-List Mast rake adjustment
Sorry Dennis, on reading again now I see what you are doing…got confused
when you said the new hypotenuse was 46.487, compared to what it was at
44…actually I don’t see why you need to change
14 matches
Mail list logo
