The output is apparently correct and compilable.
It is just not kernel style. I'm not sure there
is a defect really, just wanted to bring it up.
Maybe the first transform could be better written.
It seems that the shown differences in source code formatting come from your
first semantic
On Wed, 2 Apr 2014, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
The output is apparently correct and compilable.
It is just not kernel style. I'm not sure there
is a defect really, just wanted to bring it up.
Maybe the first transform could be better written.
It seems that the shown differences in
The intent of Coccinelle is that the output should follow the Linux coding
guidelines.
I would find it also useful to support other source code format styles.
How do you think about corresponding configuration options for the
pretty-printing functionality?
Regards,
Markus
Indeed, it works mostly better, because Coccinelle takes charge
of the interaction between the ) and the {, but if ther is some
specific spacing in E, that will be lost.
Would you like to clarify this implementation detail a bit more?
Are there any chances that this software will become able
On Wed, 2 Apr 2014, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
The intent of Coccinelle is that the output should follow the Linux coding
guidelines.
I would find it also useful to support other source code format styles.
How do you think about corresponding configuration options for the
pretty-printing
