> I missed the one code path you pointed out, and that should be fixed,
> but that doesn't mean that the original patch should be reverted, as it
> is the way we want things to be, let's just fix up the bug and move on.
OK, that is a clear statement.
So, what is your opinion on the original clea
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 06:56:51PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
> > > You got me wondering, though, that it could not be correct to call
> > > platform_driver_register() from the platform core instead of module
> > > init. I will check tomorrow. Still, this would be a bug independent of
> > > my s
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 06:56:51PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
> > > You got me wondering, though, that it could not be correct to call
> > > platform_driver_register() from the platform core instead of module
> > > init. I will check tomorrow. Still, this would be a bug independent of
> > > my s
> > You got me wondering, though, that it could not be correct to call
> > platform_driver_register() from the platform core instead of module
> > init. I will check tomorrow. Still, this would be a bug independent of
> > my series. Although I'd need to respin it if platform_driver_probe()
> > nee
