On Thu, 17 Nov 2016, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > The idea with the script constraints on metavariables feature is that the
> > script code there should only contain a function call.
>
> I would like to add another view to this software evolution for
> further considerations.
> The purpose of
> The idea with the script constraints on metavariables feature is that the
> script code there should only contain a function call.
I would like to add another view to this software evolution for
further considerations.
The purpose of such a function call can be interpreted in different ways,
>
> The idea with the script constraints on metavariables feature is that the
> script code there should only contain a function call. The actual
> function definition should be elsewhere; probably in an initialize rule.
This information can be reasonable to some degree.
How will the software
> I am thinking about an other use case a bit more where I have got a few
> SmPL script templates which are working to some degree. If I would like
> to use also the functionality “Script constraints on meta-variables”
> (instead of a big regular expression) for a function name selection on
>
A PhD (3 years) and a postdoc position (15 months) are available at
Inria/LIP6 in Paris in the Whisper team in the context of the joint ANR/NRF
project "ITrans: Automatic inference of software transformation rules for
automatically back and forward porting legacy infrastructure software".
The PhD
On Wed, 16 Nov 2016, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > In a script rule, the metavariable declarations are interpreted by
> > Coccinelle,
> > not the scripting language, so an include would not be allowed there.
>
> This detail was clear for me in principle.
>
>
> > Script rules also don't have
> In a script rule, the metavariable declarations are interpreted by Coccinelle,
> not the scripting language, so an include would not be allowed there.
This detail was clear for me in principle.
> Script rules also don't have constraints on metavariables anyway,
Can other SmPL rule types
Can such initialisation code be constructed by the specification of several
script parts there?
>>> I don't understand the question.
>> I suggest to consider corresponding design consequences again.
>>
>>
>>> If the script language supports includes, then you can put includes in the
>>>
On Wed, 16 Nov 2016, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > I don't understand what it would mean for syntax to or not to matter.
>
> I am checking if the mentioned SmPL statement could be used just for the
> inclusion of a bit of code for a metavariable constraint within a script
> template.
In a
On Wed, 16 Nov 2016, Reshetova, Elena wrote:
> > >You may want to run coccinelle/scripts/idutils_index.sh in your code base.
> > >Then if you use the argument --use-idutils it will select the relevant
> > >files up front from the index and be even more >efficient. Skipping means
> > >that it
> >You may want to run coccinelle/scripts/idutils_index.sh in your code base.
> >Then if you use the argument --use-idutils it will select the relevant files
> >up front from the index and be even more >efficient. Skipping means that it
> >essentialy did a grep and didn't find anything. If the
>You may want to run coccinelle/scripts/idutils_index.sh in your code base.
>Then if you use the argument --use-idutils it will select the relevant files
>up front from the index and be even more >efficient. Skipping means that it
>essentialy did a grep and didn't find anything. If the
12 matches
Mail list logo
