On Wed, 27 Dec 2017, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> >>> The cast is useful when it is to a non-pointer type.
> >>
> >> Will it be needed then to use an other metavariable for the assignment
> >> target?
> >>
> >> How much would you like to distinguish if an item should handle a pointer
> >> (or
>>> The cast is useful when it is to a non-pointer type.
>>
>> Will it be needed then to use an other metavariable for the assignment
>> target?
>>
>> How much would you like to distinguish if an item should handle a pointer
>> (or not)?
>
> The compiler will complain about an assignment between
On Wed, 27 Dec 2017, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > - x = (T)kmalloc(E1,E2);
> > + x = (T)kzalloc(E1,E2);
> >
> > This for useless pointer cast which is done implicitily.
>
> Actually, the above rule is for the case where the cast is useful.
> >>
> >> * Have you got any
> - x = (T)kmalloc(E1,E2);
> + x = (T)kzalloc(E1,E2);
>
> This for useless pointer cast which is done implicitily.
Actually, the above rule is for the case where the cast is useful.
>>
>> * Have you got any special aspects in mind here?
>>
>> * How do you think about to
>>> - x = (T)kmalloc(E1,E2);
>>> + x = (T)kzalloc(E1,E2);
>>>
>>> This for useless pointer cast which is done implicitily.
>>
>> Actually, the above rule is for the case where the cast is useful.
* Have you got any special aspects in mind here?
* How do you think about to restrict it for pointer
On Wed, 27 Dec 2017, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> >>> - x = (T)kmalloc(E1,E2);
> >>> + x = (T)kzalloc(E1,E2);
> >>>
> >>> This for useless pointer cast which is done implicitily.
> >>
> >> Actually, the above rule is for the case where the cast is useful.
>
> * Have you got any special aspects in
